LX 570 Custom Springs? (23 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

The oem 2016+ front coils appear to be 14.5mm thick and 8 coils tall (including the mini coil at the top but not including the flat one that is sort of doubled at the bottom).
 
The oem 2016+ front coils appear to be 14.5mm thick and 8 coils tall (including the mini coil at the top but not including the flat one that is sort of doubled at the bottom).
Concur on the 8 coils. What is the inner diameter (size of the doughnut hole) or outer diameter (from outside edge to outside edge)? With one of those we can figure the theoretical spring rate.
 
There's a pic of Gen 2 LX570 springs on the 100 forum, the longer rear spring also has 5.25 wraps.

That makes it the same as the shorter one for spring rate.

92 lb/in.

Maybe was a design change for Gen 2 or Gen 3? Speculation at this point. Supposed to be off a 2021.
Picture earlier in thread on page 1. The oem passenger has 6.25 coils
12.67mm, 149.7mm inner diameter
73 lb/in

Really?

 
It’s 6 5/8” to the outside of the factory coil springs. It was easier to measure these accurately since they’re off the truck.

3F43B48E-4FFD-47D2-BDEA-DAE620AE4917.jpeg
 
Oem rear driver
12.67mm, 175mm outer, 5.25 wraps
149.7mm inner diameter
92 lb/in
ok. so that makes this

Driver - 12.67mm, 168.3mm outer (143mm inner), 5.25 wraps - 105 in /lb
Pass - 12.67, 168.3mm outer (143mm inner), 6.25 wraps - 82 in / lb

So now the driver is exactly the same measured and theoretical at 105 in / lb

Not sure how springs combine, but if it's linearly than the mean of above is 93.5 in / lb between the two.
 
I've always wondered why the passenger side coil is longer on the factory setup. My current thinking is that the passenger side has more droop capacity because of the panhard geometry. Combined with minor weight differences with the gas tank on that side.
 
I've always wondered why the passenger side coil is longer on the factory setup. My current thinking is that the passenger side has more droop capacity because of the panhard geometry. Combined with minor weight differences with the gas tank on that side.
I would think the same thing but the brake lines seemed to limit the articulation more on the passenger side than the driver’s side. Then the interference of the upper link to the gas tank is next. Driver’s side seemed to articulate more easily (each side worked on with the lower portion of shock removed).
 
ok. so that makes this

Driver - 12.67mm, 168.3mm outer (143mm inner), 5.25 wraps - 105 in /lb
Pass - 12.67, 168.3mm outer (143mm inner), 6.25 wraps - 82 in / lb

So now the driver is exactly the same measured and theoretical at 105 in / lb

Not sure how springs combine, but if it's linearly than the mean of above is 93.5 in / lb between the two.
If memory serves, the passenger rear is not only longer, it actually has a thinner coil. In other words the driver rear has 5 coils at whatever the thickness of the wire is…the passenger rear has 6 coils but has a thinner wire.
 
If memory serves, the passenger rear is not only longer, it actually has a thinner coil. In other words the driver rear has 5 coils at whatever the thickness of the wire is…the passenger rear has 6 coils but has a thinner wire.
You are correct. I’m at about 12.45 on most of the passenger coil 👍🏼
 
ok. so that makes this

Driver - 12.67mm, 168.3mm outer (143mm inner), 5.25 wraps - 105 in /lb
Pass - 12.67, 168.3mm outer (143mm inner), 6.25 wraps - 82 in / lb

So now the driver is exactly the same measured and theoretical at 105 in / lb

Not sure how springs combine, but if it's linearly than the mean of above is 93.5 in / lb between the two.
Pass coil updated to new coil thickness

Pass - 12.45mm, 168.3mm outer (143.4mm inner). 6.25 wraps -> 76 in / lb

Avg now 90 in / lb
 
I would think the same thing but the brake lines seemed to limit the articulation more on the passenger side than the driver’s side. Then the interference of the upper link to the gas tank is next. Driver’s side seemed to articulate more easily (each side worked on with the lower portion of shock removed).

I may have it backwards. Will have to noodle on it a bit more. :)
 
I may have it backwards. Will have to noodle on it a bit more. :)
You could be right. Although I think the shock really limits a lot of droop on either side. W/o them attached, it was crazy how much more articulation I could get and has me planning on moving the lower shock up to that next hole with a large grade 8 bolt through it as some have already done. Then I’ll adjust the bumpstop down accordingly.
 
You could be right. Although I think the shock really limits a lot of droop on either side. W/o them attached, it was crazy how much more articulation I could get and has me planning on moving the lower shock up to that next hole with a large grade 8 bolt through it as some have already done. Then I’ll adjust the bumpstop down accordingly

Changing the mount will do wonders for you!
 
After a week of rolling on these TTCS-2168 and a set of 50mm coil spacers equaling the total height of the OEM passenger coil, I’d have to say this coil and spacer combo is a great small improvement and not overly stiff or bouncy. (EDIT: almost great 🤦🏻‍♂️ See my next post…)

This would be one link if someone else wanted to use the spacers along with the factory cone shaped coil bumpstop…


…and I’m not using the factory coil bumpstop so I think I am using what they consider 80 series 50mm spacer…

6FD53DBF-0587-4B7E-8B7C-5EFBCBE5A56A.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Well, over the weekend, I had the chance to do some more higher speed miles on the Interstate. And when it drops into the faster speed “low” mode, I did experience a more bouncy ride. I switched from sport to normal and to comfort, just trying to see how the suspension was dealing with it in every mode and it was better in Normal and comfort. I would usually use Sport on the interstate, and it felt better after cycling through the other modes when returning to sport mode but still a noticeable difference. Especially noticeable as a difference between the spring rates front to back. So when going over seams, the vehicle seemed to react different front to rear. Front was softer than the rear and the rear seemed under damped.

I have the Westcott front coil spacer and preload spacer that @TeCKis300 recommended on order. We’ll see if that helps match front to rear.

Or ideally, I’d love to just know how to eliminate the high speed low mode! Anyone know if there is someone we could send that little ECU to in order to eliminate that specific function?
 
I’d love to just know how to eliminate the high speed low mode!
I think 45" tires aught to practically do it.
 
Well, over the weekend, I had the chance to do some more higher speed miles on the Interstate. And when it drops into the faster speed “low” mode, I did experience a more bouncy ride. I switched from sport to normal and to comfort, just trying to see how the suspension was dealing with it in every mode and it was better in Normal and comfort. I would usually use Sport on the interstate, and it felt better after cycling through the other modes when returning to sport mode but still a noticeable difference. Especially noticeable as a difference between the spring rates front to back. So when going over seams, the vehicle seemed to react different front to rear. Front was softer than the rear and the rear seemed under damped.

I have the Westcott front coil spacer and preload spacer that @TeCKis300 recommended on order. We’ll see if that helps match front to rear.

Or ideally, I’d love to just know how to eliminate the high speed low mode! Anyone know if there is someone we could send that little ECU to in order to eliminate that specific function?
When was the last time your accumulators were replaced?
What size coil spacers are you running?
 
When was the last time your accumulators were replaced?
What size coil spacers are you running?
Never replaced accumulators, which is in the back of my mind @ 218k miles.

And the size of coil spacer I posted up there 👆🏼 but it’s a 50mm. Admittedly more than anyone else so far on this 2168 coil. However the total height is equal to the OEM passenger coil.
 
Never replaced accumulators, which is in the back of my mind @ 218k miles.

And the size of coil spacer I posted up there 👆🏼 but it’s a 50mm. Admittedly more than anyone else so far on this 2168 coil. However the total height is equal to the OEM passenger coil.
I had a bouncy ride that slowly snuck up on me when the truck was about 10 years old (less than 100k miles). Cost like $600 to replace accumulators. Fixed the bouncy ride. Not a difficult job.
 
Well, over the weekend, I had the chance to do some more higher speed miles on the Interstate. And when it drops into the faster speed “low” mode, I did experience a more bouncy ride. I switched from sport to normal and to comfort, just trying to see how the suspension was dealing with it in every mode and it was better in Normal and comfort. I would usually use Sport on the interstate, and it felt better after cycling through the other modes when returning to sport mode but still a noticeable difference. Especially noticeable as a difference between the spring rates front to back. So when going over seams, the vehicle seemed to react different front to rear. Front was softer than the rear and the rear seemed under damped.

I have the Westcott front coil spacer and preload spacer that @TeCKis300 recommended on order. We’ll see if that helps match front to rear.

Or ideally, I’d love to just know how to eliminate the high speed low mode! Anyone know if there is someone we could send that little ECU to in order to eliminate that specific function?

From your description, I get the sense that you're oversprung in the rear. Meaning at the lower ride height, that too much of the rig weight is transferred to the physical coil springs. The AHC system is not carrying enough load at that point and unable to impart enough damping. Seems to be what you suspect as well? It's much like a stock LX when kneeling, is unable to provide enough damping, as all the weight is dumped on the coil springs in that mode.

If I had to guess, I'm thinking the uprated rear spring is too much spring rate for your relativley stock weight rig? What you probably are looking for is a taller spring with stockish spring rate. Longer free length to get taller ride height. With lower rate to get slinky long travel?

It's a funny balance between spring free length and spring rate. Each can sometimes be traded to get the desired ride height. They are different things though.

I think you might find more success is using the stock spring, 50mm spacers, and the axle mount relocation. Then optionally airbags. I really like bags because they are a magic component to get adjustable spring rate.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom