Engine disassembly 4
Next day. I was cautiously optimistic that in the full light of day no horrors would be revealed; no liners in the bores or other shoddy machine work (one of the improvements of the 3Bii over the 3B was the use of a parent bore, rather than liners). But something in the back of my mind was telling me that local mechanics must have put that head gasket in and will no doubt have screwed things up.
Scraping all the old head gasket material away, my heart sank when I ran my fingers over a smooth depression in the deck of the block, right where the No.1 pre-combustion chamber is held between the head and the block. Without the extra profiles for the chambers which the 3Bii head gasket has, I suspect that the flat 14B* gasket has allowed combustion gasses over the years to escape the cylinder and undermine the head gasket around the pre-combustion chamber. It's hard to see in this photo, but you can see it matching the shape in the piston crown. How I hate pre-combustion chambers!
A step has been worn at the edge of the block, though I am not so worried about this as it will partially come out in the rebore, and hopefully any remainder can be chamfered. But with a straight edge and feeler gauge I estimate (very roughly) that the depression is up to 0.30 mm which would be right on the limit for piston protrusion, before the pistons would need to be turned down.
Cylinder No. 1 is the worst by far; No. 2 is perfect with all the original machining lines still visible. No. 3 has just a shadow of imperfection but all machining lines still present, and No.4 is just starting to erode. Had it been only one cylinder, I would maybe have suspected component failure, but the fact that it is present on 3 out of 4 cylinders indicates to me it was either the incorrect gasket, or incorrect installation of pre-combustion chambers in the head. Either way, the mechanics strike again. And have I mentioned how much I hate separate pre-combustion chambers!?
What a disappointment. I though the engine was the one thing that had escaped sloppy maintenance (and I believe the previous owner must have serviced the engine religiously) but shoddy, incompetent mechanics have potentially ruined this too. I'll take the block to a machine shop and see how much comes off in order to make it flat.
Nothing to do but continue to strip down the engine.
Before taking the pistons out, I measure the thrust clearance of the connecting rods. Standard clearance is 0.20 - 0.32 mm, with a limit of 0.40 mm.
1) 0.21 mm
2) 0.23 mm
3) 0.24 mm
4) 0.285 mm
With the pistons out, the crankshaft thrust clearance is checked. Standard is 0.04 to 0.25 mm, and I measure 0.09 mm.
I'm astounded at the condition of the moving parts of the engine - as well as the perfect tolerances of the connecting rods and crankshaft, the pistons emerge one after the other looking perfect - all rings are intact and free, no visible wear in the ring lands, no skirt wear, and even the oil control rings don't look worn. All the crankshaft bearings are perfect with only the lightest signs of wear, no scoring. They are standard size Taiho bearings and I am quite sure are factory original. From what I see, the journals look perfect. I feel bad for the previous owner - he has clearly meticulously cared for the engine (shame he neglected the transmission and transfer!) but has been scuppered by our mechanics.
So, overall, the bad news is that the block will need significant machining, perhaps to the point of needing to turn the pistons. On the up-side, the block has not previously been machined, rebored or had liners fitted, so might come good after machining and a +0.50 mm rebore.
Time for some machine work and to buy a second engine.
EO