Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I see that coil. Your lift height should be good in that they spec that rear coil at 4” lift, which relates to a 24” hub to flare. 24” h-f correlates to a 15.75” coil height. Free height of that coil is 19.3” meaning the coils compresses 3.55” at ride height. The weight needed to compress that based on the 411# spring rate is 3.55x822 (411x2 coils) which equals 2918#. Add in the unsprung weight of about 600# for axle and wheels and you get a scale weight of 3518#. Subtract from stock rear axle weight of ~2500# and you come to 1000# over stock. That’s kinda the backing in way to figure the Ironman specs. Your scale weight of 3800# should put you slightly below the 24” h-f which I think you were shooting for.
The spring rate of 411# is the highest I have seen for our trucks. Definitely will be stiffer than your previous 320# of the 171 coils. Not sure how that will play out. May be hard to stuff the rear during articulation? Definitely should feel not so loosey goosey obviously. The coil height is also pretty short for a 4” lift spec so coil may unseat when fully drooped depending on the shocks you got (4” vs 6” MRR).
I run 1000# heavier than you on the rear axle and run a tall coil with 375# rate and overall pretty happy with those. Overall curious to see your new setup.
I may have missed it, but have you tried driving without the rear swaybar attached yet?
No I haven't. I drove with the front SB detached and do that often for technical stuff where lots of articulation will be had. I have two Whiteline SBs in order to maintain excellent hwy manners given how much weight I have up top.