HJ47 12HT changed plan to FJ62 12HT

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Yet another jewel sir! too nice to drive but begging to hit the road.
 
The original plan was the 50gal LR tank but I later changed my mind and installed the original again, the rear springs too heavy duty and the rig seems a bit nose heavy.
I will need to remove one of the extra HD leaves at the rear.

D0C8CEB9-6BE2-4492-939E-D948A12E1BE3.jpeg
 
I'd add to the front if that gem was in my driveway.:grinpimp:

What is the back-space on those beautiful wheels?
 
I wish you didn't live half way around the world. i have some museum projects that would suit your unique talents perfectly.
 
I'd add to the front if that gem was in my driveway.:grinpimp:

What is the back-space on those beautiful wheels?

Wow what a rain of :cheers: likes
Photo is the original FJ62 body I used. Originally on 4” spring shackles and 35” muddies.
I was into no more than 2” lift on 33” AT.
That’s a good height to get the curbs at the cafe down the road and less bouncy behind the 12HT that makes her very fast at times. So I wouldn’t want to raise her more than that front as is now 2”.

The wheels are mines, split rim centres into 8” tubeless outers, running 285/75R16 BFG AT’s.
The backspace is the standard 3.5” so that’s why I have a nice outer contour of 4.5” adding up to the 8”.
The rims back is like the stock sits and the outer edge is just within the non-flared fender line.
The wheel to the hub is as if I had a 1” spacer on the stock R16 rims but the difference is that it also has an additional 1” towards the inside having 1/2” off dead centre. It feels
glued to the road in curves, maybe the added rear Sahara sway bar that has a say too.

9DD5A730-135B-4087-8C2A-20D7C3592C84.jpeg


98B651B3-EEE7-4291-BCF5-3ED576477335.jpeg
 
Last edited:
What is the new tyre size? 285/75/16 or 305/70/16?
 
Splendid. Thanks for the detailed shot. Those wheels ROCK.
 
You should do the same wheels for the other project you shared with me.
 
Exactly. maybe go 3.25 inch to keep the tyres from scrubbing the rear inner wheel wells?
 
Exactly. maybe go 3.25 inch to keep the tyres from scrubbing the rear inner wheel wells?
Yes, I did all experiments, at 3.25 the outer offset 4.75 given the split cetre is a straight disc woud put too much sheer on the welds outwards. Ideally it should be in the middle of the outer at 4”. With the 7” outers it falls exactly on midline 3.5BS. The 8” outers I kept the same as the added 1/2” inbalance is well within tolerance. Probably it could get away with 3.25 too but I’m a safe player :meh: especially wheels :skull:
Ah, yes and fenders and wells are miles off even with 35 muddies anyway.
The only obstacle going beyont 3.5” would be the tie rod arm knuckles, but with 3.5BS they are about 1/2” away the inner rim edge.
 
The problem with having the wheels too much spaced out is not really an axle or steering issue however all that is in play.
I have a mate running the late model 79 series ute where the rear axle is shorter.
He runs 2.5” spacers to make it look beast, he needs to repack the rear wheel bearings (!!) each and every oil change.
The inner bearing is the larger and so the centre of gravity of the wheel falls between the two bearings somewhat closer to the inner bearing.
Spacing the wheels out changes the weight bearing design of the hub , the bearings and ultimately the spindles .. which we know are welded up to the diff housing. If that weld fails is a hell of a bounce!
 
Some more inspiration.. the engine block is back from acid bath. Since it’s all STD that is going back I only got the bores honed and the deck cleaned. I am planning to use KBS Ford light blue but first I get the block thoroughly washed.
The pistons I got are Teikin brand. That is an Indonesian OE manufacturer and just about the best you can get for the 12HT. Otherwise it was some no name chinese and another Taiwanese available in Australian vendors. I went with Teikin and much to my surprise it is really a nice quality piston. I have tweeked them with ceramic coating however and will be balanced too.

View attachment 1582502

View attachment 1582503

View attachment 1582504

View attachment 1582506
i know this an old thread but im doing up an 2l te and probably will go with teikin pistons or will just reuse my oem ceramic matrix renforced Ringland pistons what kind of ceramic coating did you use on the skirt? and any hcance you know a company that can do an equivalent in new zealand or should i send them to like Line2Line in usa to get it done? is it just hvof but with different specific materials? if so what's the best hvof ceramic composition?
 
Last edited:
HVOF is something else. My pistons and bearings were ceramic coated at CIC high performance ceramics. Their website explains the coating systems they offer for engine parts and their use. Regarding the Teikin pistons so far so good and I am quite happy with them, but there are a few more details into the rebuild apart the pistons :doh:
 
HVOF is something else. My pistons and bearings were ceramic coated at CIC high performance ceramics. Their website explains the coating systems they offer for engine parts and their use. Regarding the Teikin pistons so far so good and I am quite happy with them, but there are a few more details into the rebuild apart the pistons :doh:
The skirt coating necessary for long life engine? If going to oversize? Or is it just for extra sealing or making up pistons to wall clearance for std?
 
What do you mean by Australian tray?
That is just silly.. I guess it was like always been the Aussie farmers are tight ass to keep their hard earned coins, and that is the only reason they sell cab chassis in Australia. Its like the pto. A stock pto at the time was $3.5k and Thomas made a pto for $2k so most people had Thomas whinches on their cruisers. Its only economic consideration nothing else.
Any right minded 40' series lover would blindly choose the genuine tray before any after market one.
Also the panel tray bed is a million times better looking than that ugly lorry back end. I want a DD that means to drive it every day and it doesn't mean that I want to look like in a bricklayers lorry.
How can you advise such a bad idea. You want my truck to look ugly or that is your envious response only?

This could be the greatest post I’ve ever read on mud….
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom