Choosing between 2 different used 100's.
Greetings all,
I just registered and figured:
"why not jump right in and ask one of those forum newbie, eye-rolling, 'oh-no-not-this-again' questions?"
I am new to LC's and hoping to pull the trigger on a used 100 in the near future. A couple which I am looking at are very similar, with the exception that one of them has the manual locking differential (which I'm told is "better"), while the other has the auto traction control.
As far as use...I would not describe myself as what I think of as a hard-core off-roader. I don't plan to try and challenge the truck to extreme tests, go bouldering, or anything like a lot of folks might be into. That said, I hunt and fish and like to camp in some out-of-the-way places.
It breaks down as follows:
2000 - almost 140,000 miles, asking just over 13K, manual lockers
2002 - almost exactly 130,000 miles, asking just under 15K, traction control
The 2000 is gray and has no Nav, which I like. I have seen this one in person (though the place was closed, so obviously no test drive and only looked at it from the outside). It seemed OK. Lots of scratches (not a huge deal) and some worn leather. No huge flaws, but nothing spectacular to write home about, either.
The 2002 seems to be in much better shape. It has the Nav and is white, neither of which I'm a fan of but can live with. I haven't seen the it in person yet. Looks nice in the photos, but don't they all...
Clean CarFaxes on both. The dealer for the 2002 actually sent me a copy; it spent much of its life as a corporate vehicle out in CO and has had the timing belt and a bunch of other stuff done. No details on the CarFax for the 2000 - dealer just said it was initially a 36K lease, then was sold and has had no accidents.
They are close enough in price that money is not a big issue for me. I don't want to pay more than I need to, of course. But I just want the best, most reliable truck for my needs.
I guess I'm kinda rambling and maybe even over-thinking it at this point. Sorry!
In a nutshell, if it was your money, which do you think would be a better truck for a Northern MN winter and some "mild" off-roading, camping, escaping from zombies, etc.? Is either of these model years considered a "year to avoid at all costs," or are they basically the same?
Thanks for your infinite patience!
rk