Lol no way. I’ve bent the end links of chains when off-roading in the snow. There is often tire spin involved even with chains. There is no way cable ties would last on a trail with buried rocks and roots.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Lol no way. I’ve bent the end links of chains when off-roading in the snow. There is often tire spin involved even with chains. There is no way cable ties would last on a trail with buried rocks and roots.
That was my thinking as well. However, I was surprised reading in my 2018 J200 manual that there is a clear recommendation to put chains on the rear tires and explicitly stating to not put chains on the front tires. I am curious about the reason behind that recommendation. See manual:With only one set of chains, I would go front everytime.
You have traction on the steering tires then, not just forward/reverse control, but also directional control
Chains on the front of an ifs vehicle will usually have problems interfering with a-arms/ball joint area.That was my thinking as well. However, I was surprised reading in my 2018 J200 manual that there is a clear recommendation to put chains on the rear tires and explicitly stating to not put chains on the front tires. I am curious about the reason behind that recommendation. See manual:
View attachment 3564575
Did you read post 13? Also, in high range power to the front wheels is subordinate to power delivered to the rear traction being equal.That was my thinking as well. However, I was surprised reading in my 2018 J200 manual that there is a clear recommendation to put chains on the rear tires and explicitly stating to not put chains on the front tires. I am curious about the reason behind that recommendation. See manual:
View attachment 3564575
Ok sorry, I noticed I posted in the 80-series forum, instead 200 and I can't find a way to delete my post but can only edit it. Anyways, may be the same recommendation exists for the 80 series.
Then how do most passenger cars on this planet ever chain up and run down the road successfully?Chains on the front of an ifs vehicle will usually have problems interfering with a-arms/ball joint area.
I don’t know. I wasn’t thinking about passenger cars. Have you tried fitting heavy duty chains to the front of a 4Runner or 200 series? I was just looking at a 4Runner the other day and I wouldn’t try running chains on the front due to clearance issues with the upper control arm.Then how do most passenger cars on this planet ever chain up and run down the road successfully?
I was unaware that we are arguing.I don’t know. I wasn’t thinking about passenger cars. Have you tried fitting heavy duty chains to the front of a 4Runner or 200 series? I was just looking at a 4Runner the other day and I wouldn’t try running chains on the front due to clearance issues with the upper control arm.
Seems you advocate for chains on the rear anyway so not sure why we are arguing.
How? Why?Did you read post 13? Also, in high range power to the front wheels is subordinate to power delivered to the rear traction being equal.
My comment is based on times when I’ve forgotten to mash the CDL button while in low range ( part time kit installed) on a boulder strewn trail. Now that you make the question, and I think more about the internal workings of the T-case, you are probably correct.How? Why?
80 series transfer splits torque 50/50 front and rear doesn't it?