@TeCKis300 :
Which multiple tire insiders with first hand data knowledge, said new technology allowed them to create a tire that performed above the then competition. "W" standing for wear, winter, and wet so you know it designed to perform in those highlight areas.
That was back in ~2017. I still hold AT3Ws in high regard given my time with them and would buy them again. Having the deepest tread in the competitive set is a big thing for long term performance IMO.
——————————————————————————————————————-
Tire insider? Website advertisement does not count.

Just because it has a “W” then we should take it at its word???
Falken is heavy. Heavier than other tires of similar size. Heavy as hell in fact. Why? I thought that “new technology” would help with weight, no?
The reason for Falken’s being such a fat a$$ tire is that they cut corners to keep cost low and used regular steel plies instead of high-tensile steel plies that other companies use! Thus, the weight DISADVANTAGE! Cheap materials resulting in disadvantage for consumer.
Or another famed “benefit”…that they “rolled” their tread to the edge of sidewall for strength??? Only to find out that their sidewall is paper-thin and very susceptible to sidewall puncture…almost as weak as the infamous GY Duratracs sidewall!!
Deep tread? Except that their warranty is no better than other tires. Their treadwear is no better than other similar tire. So, if tread depth is so impressive (and i agree they are deep!), then why does it wear like an average tire??? Maybe because their rubber compound is less impressive than you think?
If tread depth is what we look at…then why does Michelin Defender has some of the shallowest tread depth yet performs forever?!