NCFJ
Supporting Vendor
Now that they both retired, they sold and move to the mountains in North Carolina.
I have a place in Hendersonville, NC. Where in the mountains did they locate?
Stan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Now that they both retired, they sold and move to the mountains in North Carolina.
Don't let the dyno numbers fool you. Lot of variables and factors involved when figuring that number. So you're making 215 rwhp and 368 ft lbs. A lot of that power gets lost through the drivetrain (15% to 25%) and your tire size and weight plays a roll. Another factor is the type of dyno. Was it a hydraulic dyno or the Mustang chassis dyno with roller? If the seat of the pants feeling is good and it should be with the torque you're making and you smile when you drive it that's all that matters. What was the crank hp on your motor? 360 hp or 322 hp? That's an L96 vortec motor right?
I'll keep that in mind. Right now, I'm entertaining buying a complete wrecked donor rather than just the drivetrain. Either way, I'll try to be sure to get the BCM too. I definitely want cc to function.
You would need an adapter to add another oil pressure sensor, if you try and drill and tap the pictured you'll ruin it.
Just ditch the factory GM sender. It serves no purpose for engine running. It's only use would be if you were using the GM dash and gauge.Well, looks like the LS3 pan is a bust for low-lifts.
This is sitting on the bump stops with 1.5" spacers.. stops pretty compressed. Pan hits the axle by MAYBE 1/8".. If it had 1/4" of clearance I'd go with it. For perspective, the bar across left/middle is the top-rear of the axle housing, the mass in top right is the front of the LS3 pan.
View attachment 1404053
Still.. someone with a 4" lift, 2" bump spacers, and probably slee arms could get it to clear. With stock radius arms I think the caster correction for a 4" lift would roll the axle back more and increase pan/axle contact.
Looks like an F-body pan with only 5qts is in my future. I'll definitely be running a thermostat-controlled oil cooler of some kind.
I also think I found a good location for the Oil pressure gauge sender to keep it away from the exhaust manifolds and make the harness run shorter.
On the rear of the lifter valley cover is a post that sticks up and the GM oil pressure sender is screwed in. There's plenty of room between that and the "well" in the firewall for the length of the stock inline-6 engine to have the toyota oil sender pointed backward. So I'll remove the cover soon and make sure there's enough room and meat to drill/tap for the toyota sensor.
View attachment 1404054
View attachment 1404055
I THINK the thread is 1/8-28 pipe thread.. or at least the tap I have of that thread seems like a perfect match. Will do some research before I drill/tap the cover however.
Just ditch the factory GM sender. It serves no purpose for engine running. It's only use would be if you were using the GM dash and gauge.
I just put the toyota sender in place of the GM with and adapter. Very clean
Why would that ruin it? I was planning on going in the side/rear of the post and leaving the original sensor so the ECM has its input.
Just ditch the factory GM sender. It serves no purpose for engine running. It's only use would be if you were using the GM dash and gauge.
I just put the toyota sender in place of the GM with and adapter. Very clean
It seemed that you were talking about drilling a hole the factory oil pressure sensor? Or a you talking about drilling a new hole in the block? Either way there is a cheap adapter that will allow for two.
My LS has no post at that location, needing the adapter.
No, I want to drill a hole in the rear-facing side of the post that rises up on the lifter valley cover for the GM sensor. Stock sensor could then be screwed in on top as normal.
My thinking is that the wires are already there, the ECM is looking for the sensor, I've seen reports of low oil pressure shutting off fuel pump (which I personally want). As to the disabling aspect.. I never travel without some dignoatic capability, and if things operate as some in this thread describe I could just unplug the sensor if it malfunctions and the truck should run.
Anyone else heard of the fast-idle feature on vortec trucks?
Personally I wouldn't chance drilling the hole for a $20 adapter... That's just me
As for the function of the oil sensor I'm 99% sure it tied into fuel pump relay, maybe if you deleted that input off the ECM it would go away but it's a fail safe built in by GM!! I would want to keep it too
I haven't seen an adapter that would both T out for a second Toyota sender and keep the factory GM one. Guess I need to do some more digging.