The reality of the marketplace finds the LC changing to fit the times. The 80 is vintage. It's constructed differently than modern Toyotas.
The 100 suits the market it was created for. I think Toyota has literature on the design objectives of each.
The 120 is also appropriate for the market it was created for.
The 120 and 100 are on different branches of the LC family tree. The 120 is a development of/replacement of the 90 series. The 120 is not a replacement of the 100.
Looking on the 100 vs. 80 in 2005, I think it can be said they are two very different SUV's that share a common heritage.
Which is better depends on the person owning it.
I will say that both have that 'aura' of something special. I think the GX470 also has that feeling.
The 100 suits the market it was created for. I think Toyota has literature on the design objectives of each.
The 120 is also appropriate for the market it was created for.
The 120 and 100 are on different branches of the LC family tree. The 120 is a development of/replacement of the 90 series. The 120 is not a replacement of the 100.
Looking on the 100 vs. 80 in 2005, I think it can be said they are two very different SUV's that share a common heritage.
Which is better depends on the person owning it.
I will say that both have that 'aura' of something special. I think the GX470 also has that feeling.