200 Series Tire and Wheel Size Database (10 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

@gaijin what’s recommended tire pressure for the above setup? Thx in advance!!!

The RCTIP for those MAXXIS AT-811 RAZR AT 35X11.50R17LT 121R Load Range E on your LC200 is 35psi F/R.

HTH
 
Thx! It’s only rubbing at full lock so I may just leave it as is. I’m hoping with alignment it will fix it.

I am curious what true measurements are for the 35x12.5.

I feel like this size I have is close to 295/70/18 sizes.

Well my gal drives the 200 99% of the time so I’d have to see if she can deal with the rub or not
 
Maxxis Razr at811 tire specs
35x11.5x17
34.7 at 12.10 width
63.228

Actual measurements:
33.7/8 hight
34.6 left to right measurement

Wheel is 17s 0 offset. Rubs kdss bolt driver side at full lock. Will see if alignment will help get rid of it.

Reason for for this tire is planning to run all season. Has 3 peak snowflake certified and the size for less rubbing. This required BMC and fender liners cutting and massaging.

Still need to do flex test.

View attachment 3182853

View attachment 3182854

View attachment 3182855
Great tire option! Flotation load rating of 121 will drive nice and supple, a bit narrower to aid fitment issues.
 
The RCTIP for those MAXXIS AT-811 RAZR AT 35X11.50R17LT 121R Load Range E on your LC200 is 35psi F/R.

HTH

If anyones paying attention, this^ one is the most interesting one yet.
 
Well my gal drives the 200 99% of the time so I’d have to see if she can deal with the rub or not
If you take care of the wheel fenders rub it should be fine. The kdss kiss at full lock may be the only thing to worry but even then we just gotta know not to plus most of the time we’re not going full lock anyways. At least that’s how I feel and I’m only speaking of my setup.
 
Flotation power.

Is that still the case these days though?
I have yet to find a meaningful difference outside of width from a reputable source.
Ive meaning to ask Toyo about this.

If you consider load ID, not sure why you would alter pressure over an LT equivalent, unless you were using flawed outdated methods.
Specially if you consider them as having more complex internal structure, running less PSI violates the assumptions of the model from the get go.
 
And wait till people find out it’s a ply equivalent rating in the first place. A C load LT has a 3 ply sidewall. I asked the Toyo technical team myself.
It even says 6 P.R. right on the tire.

I wish we could come to some common understanding on tires in this forum. Not because I want to be right, but because it is honestly a matter of safety.
 
I’m referring to my own observed experience across a few sizes of metrics and flotation. I’m not sure what the actual construction differences are for flotation marking, but they ride better and seem more pliable Aired down. My back to back was a 275/80r18 vs a 35x10.5r17. Recommended pressure in both is 35ish. But the ride couldn’t be more different.
 
I’m referring to my own observed experience across a few sizes of metrics and flotation. I’m not sure what the actual construction differences are for flotation marking, but they ride better and seem more pliable Aired down. My back to back was a 275/80r18 vs a 35x10.5r17. Recommended pressure in both is 35ish. But the ride couldn’t be more different.

Was it the same tire too though?
You also did add some more sidewall on that change.

I’m going to ask Toyo tech email line about this and see how they differ in the internals. I’m curious myself.
 
Was it the same tire too though?
You also did add some more sidewall on that change.

I’m going to ask Toyo tech email line about this and see how they differ in the internals. I’m curious myself.
not same tire, was same manufacturer. also different style at vs mt. definitely i'm not in science land here. Just observation. my non tire science opinion is to get the tallest, narrowest, lowest load number tire you can. for peace of mind I prefer 3 sidewall plies, but I didn't gash any of the 2 sidewall options.

I doubt this will be a universally held opinion.

Sidewall about the same, 35.3 on 18s vs 34.5 on 17s
 
not same tire, was same manufacturer. also different style at vs mt. definitely i'm not in science land here. Just observation. my non tire science opinion is to get the tallest, narrowest, lowest load number tire you can. for peace of mind I prefer 3 sidewall plies, but I didn't gash any of the 2 sidewall options.

I doubt this will be a universally held opinion.

Sidewall about the same, 35.3 on 18s vs 34.5 on 17s

I can’t comment either really, haven’t run flotation, but looking at em lol.

What tire are you talking though? Can’t find 35x10.5 anything.
did you mean 34? That’s what I’m looking for But still only seeing couple of options on DT.
 
Been researching skinnier 35s and @grinchy been the guy at the 35x10.5.

Just earlier the Maxxis at has better stopping power than Toyo at3 in the snow. I feel it handled in the snow better.
 
I think @grinchy runs 35x10.5x17 Kenda tires. @grinchy whats ur tires actual height measurement ?
34.5". A bit over 34" weighted (vertical), still 34.5" on the side to side (horizontal).

I have probably overshared on these tires. Had them about a year now (mounted just after christmas 2021). They're still the bomb. I'll go shine the nubs now and let everyone get back to the discussion.
 
Been researching skinnier 35s and @grinchy been the guy at the 35x10.5.

Just earlier the Maxxis at has better stopping power than Toyo at3 in the snow. I feel it handled in the snow better.
A RAZR narrow in flotation is a sweet pull. If only they did their mildish MT in that size.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom