Your Thoughts on the LC 250? (7 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Few clarifying points. Folks need to lighten up and have a better sense of humor around here.

1. I will 100% admit to "rage baiting" 200 owners. Largely because I stand by my statement that MOST of the online hate toward 250s is from 200 owner because of some sort of inferiority complex.... Some light internet trolling now an then is ok! It is always in good fun! its 2025 and you can love any car you want! Were all here because we hate mud....except for the Aussies....i still dont know why they're here....

However! as a self respecting 80 series and now new 250 series owner, we have to continue the tradition of scoffing at other (lesser) Land Cruisers and the people who drive them! (obviously jokes guys)

Though personally i have never liked the asthetics or styles of the 200 series compared to the 60, 80 and 70 series LCs. For the prices they sell at, i find it hard to believe it is a better "buy" than a lot of other options for folks that use them off road on a daily basis. (honest opinion)

2. @hoser The life time powertrain warranty is very real and does not cost extra. Infact i posted the "fine print" here in this thread (pg25) for those who wish to read it. Autonation warranty backed by Fidelity. You can say "its baked into the cost" but idk what that means when Autonation is selling them cheaper than anyone else.

>2a. To be clear, when i posted the 200 for sale at $53k with 100k miles on it, idk what planet folks are living on, but theres no world where the cost of ownership on that vehicle is better than buying a new 250 with a lifetime powertrain warranty. The depreciation schedule posted does not take into account repairs or total cost of ownership. If you want to argue this point, please post a link to your excel model for review by the class. Comparatively, Mine for the 250 will show the same depreciation rate and $0 in repairs for the entire term. Assuming standard market condtions, there is no reason to assume the 250 will depreciate any different than the other generations of LCs.

That 200 series Depreciation Schedule also benifited from covid when we saw a 10-15% increase in the price of used suv/trucks as well as 30% rise in inflation over the 8 year period. (I purchased a 2019 F150 w 20k miles for $28K in March 2020. In January the next year i had a dealer offer $41k. This will most likely not be the case on a go forward basis). It is not credible to assume the 2017 200 will reflect the same depreciation rate for the 2025 to 2030 period.

3. Holy smokes that video of the 250 vs 200 on the track was pretty sweet right?
 
The China Virus definitely turned the car market on its side. I got a great deal on my 2019 gently used 200 just before the market went crazy.
However I paid for it a few years later when I bought the 4 year old 4Runner.
Having 2 teenagers driving and recently purchased the 250 I hope I am out of the car buying market for a while. In the meantime
I am fortunate enough to drive the 200 and the 250 weekly. I love them both and appreciate their differences, strengths and weaknesss. The perceived gap between them isn’t as some would have you believe.
IMG_3100.jpeg
 
Tire size is now limited to production size, so 33” for a 250 or LX600, tough to finish the race let alone try to win. More troublesome is the new wheelbase requirements. Stock Full (which the 200 and/or the LX600) have been racing in for the 13? years, now requires a minimum wheelbase of 130”, so basically all full size SUV’s are out.

So one could race the LC250/GX550 in the Stock Mid, but Maximum track width is 67.3”?!?

The rules are quite friendly for a Raptor or Bronco Raptor. Turns out Ford is a big SCORE sponsor as of late and contributed to the new rules.
Oh wow. That's way worse than I thought.

I haven't run the baja 1k, but I've been down in the general area and it definitely looks like something that would be practically impossible to win on stock size tires.

It also makes no sense to have a stock full size class that has a wheelbase min and then not allow the shorter wb to run in the next size down because of track width. A short bed regular cab full size truck and almost every midsize and full size SUV would be excluded from both classes. Even a Honda Pilot is too wide to run in Stock Mid. Is there any class they fit? It sure looks like a rule set specifically to exclude most vehicles in the category. If Honda wants to race again in a Passport - what class do they end up putting them in? Class 7?

Ford has a long track record of failure in desert racing. I guess this is the solution.
 
Replaced the horns, the one thing that truly bugged me about my 250. Took less than 10 minutes . Well worth the $
 
I recently visited the real world (Bend, Oregon) and noticed quite a few of these. It's an attractive vehicle, IMO somewhat reminiscent of the best looking LC wagon- the 60 series.

My personal preference remains with Land Cruisers from the 20th century.
 
I recently visited the real world (Bend, Oregon) and noticed quite a few of these. It's an attractive vehicle, IMO somewhat reminiscent of the best looking LC wagon- the 60 series.

I kind of see the 60 comparison in these but then I look at the 90 series and, to me, looks way more like a boxy evolution of that vehicle.

I won’t lie. The 250 is growing on me (a little). I don’t think I would ever drive one myself, but my daughter is going to be of driving age in a few short years. I think this the perfect SUV for a teen/20 something. We’ll see if Toyota can get some better tunings for that loud ass, confused motor first.

IMG_6846.jpeg
 
I was in need of a fourth vehicle as I would soon have another teenager driving. So for about a year and a half I weighed my options. I considered another 200. Couldn’t really see paying that much for a used car. I also considered a 100 series. I thought it would be fun to buy one and build it up a bit. I offered to drive the 200 and buy my wife anything. She chose to stick with the 200. The 250 was growing on me and then I made the mistake of test driving one. Game over. I was sold. That day while in route to do the test drive my daughter sent me a few photos of a 250 and said “dad this is the car for you”
The rest is history. I am really enjoying driving it every day.
 
I kind of see the 60 comparison in these but then I look at the 90 series and, to me, looks way more like a boxy evolution of that vehicle.

I won’t lie. The 250 is growing on me (a little). I don’t think I would ever drive one myself, but my daughter is going to be of driving age in a few short years. I think this the perfect SUV for a teen/20 something. We’ll see if Toyota can get some better tunings for that loud ass, confused motor first.

View attachment 3887903
It's funny how everyone sees something different. For me - it's a 5th gen 4Runner update.
1745213035677.png
 
I believe the 5th gen 4runner is and was a Land Cruiser Prado in different skin with slight slight slight differences. The 5th gen will go down in history as one of the most reliable Toyotas ever built it's engine has less issues than the mighty 200 series. I believe the Land Cruiser 250 is the rightful successor of the 5th gen 4R, And unlike some folks who assume this hybird 4banger turbo engine will fail prematurelly I think otherwise, At this point it's foolish to deny the masterminds at Toyota especailly after all the wisdom they attained over the years. So with all these considerations I believe much like it's 5th gen 4R sibling, I believe that this 4banger turbo engine will win the hearts and minds of the non believers within the next 10 years. And prove itself like it's 5th gen 4R sibling to be yet again one of the most reliable Toyotas ever built. my 2cents on the matter.
 
Last edited:
You should include a photo of the 6th gen 4 runner So that the comparison can be complete.
I think the LC250 profile is significantly closer to the 5th gen 4R than either the 5th gen 4R is to the 6th gen or the 250 is to the 150. I think Toyota saw the consumer preference for the 5th gen 4R and used the 5th gen profile and styling for the J250. 6th gen 4R looks like an afterthought. It kinda has 4th gen styling cues, but I think they missed the mark pretty badly on the styling.


1745252555866.png
 
IMO the GX550 and LX600/700H are the only two new Toyota SUVs that actually look good. The LC250 certainly isn't bad, but isn't particularly attractive either. The 6th gen T4R is downright unattractive IMO - especially considering how good the 5th gen looked and aged after 15 years of production.

Toyota appears to have taken styling cues from GM's truck division - by just adding pointlessly complex lines, details, and other useless crap to the styling, instead of making a simple and great-looking shape. The 6th gen appears to literally have about 2X as many body lines on it as the 5th gen....and it's the same for the Tundra and Tacoma (the latter of which is pretty darn ugly, IMO).
 
I own a 5th gen 4 runner. Styling cues be damned. Driving the 250 is like being in a different galaxy compared to the 4Runner
 
I own a 5th gen 4 runner. Styling cues be damned. Driving the 250 is like being in a different galaxy compared to the 4Runner
I may try to test drive a LC250. My wife's Highlander has a recall and needs to go into the dealer anyway to have some bumper/splash guard clips replaced. It will be interesting to compare the driving experience of the LC250 to my moderately-modified, 18-year old 470, since they are both re-badged Prados.

FWIW I prefer driving my GX over the new-galaxy Highlander. If I have a choice of which one to drive and it's a short enough drive that I don't care about MPG, I hop in the GX. The Highlander is a very efficient, reliable, safe, comfortable, and capable family-hauler but has zero soul and driving it feels like operating a high-end appliance. My expectation is that the LC250 will feel the same but with more ground clearance and better looks. It will be interesting to see if this expectation holds :).
 
I think the LC250 profile is significantly closer to the 5th gen 4R than either the 5th gen 4R is to the 6th gen or the 250 is to the 150. I think Toyota saw the consumer preference for the 5th gen 4R and used the 5th gen profile and styling for the J250. 6th gen 4R looks like an afterthought. It kinda has 4th gen styling cues, but I think they missed the mark pretty badly on the styling.


View attachment 3889338
The picture of the GX you're using has been modified to take away some of it's non-4Runner look.
Not sure whether you did that or that's just the picture you found to use.

The difference is simple really.
Wide C-pillar = 4Runner
Wide D-pillar = Land Cruiser
🤪

Also, as I and others have said, for the last couple generations at least, the 4Runner has been the american-bro-version of the Prado. No one should be surprised they are similar.
The 4Runner looks similar to the GX/Prado, not the other way around.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom