An alternator doesn't have as much drag as a mechanical fan, I wouldn't think. Am I wrong?
An alternator doesn't take much to turn when unloaded, like when it's off on the bench, when loaded it's a whole other story. Try running an alternator tester, it easy to hold the belt tight until the field is shorted, then takes some pretty good arm!
No, think of the steps involved.
Take mechanical energy and convert it to electrical energy (motor to alternator)
Then convert that electrical energy back into mechanical energy (alternator to fan)
You think those steps are 100% efficient? There is always a loss when converting one form of energy into another.
...
X2.
IIRC it's ~40% on each end, plus wiring, switch, etc, loses. So that 1/4hp fan is actually pulling somewhere in the neighborhood of 1hp off of the belt.
Solid and flex fans are very inefficient. A thermostat controlled clutch fan is pretty efficient, they only run when needed. All Toyota clutches can be tuned, so by simply changing the fluid they can be made weaker or stronger to meet need.
A successful argument can be made, that by carefully controlling an electric fan they can be slightly more efficient. But will never be as powerful as a clutch fan.
There is no defensible argument that will end with a complicated electrical system, that relies on the alternator working, etc, being more reliable than a simple belt driven system. For my uses (off road) simple, reliable, powerful, trumps slightly more efficient. The only reason I would run an electric fan on an off road rig would be for packaging issues. Even then it would be the last resort, prefer to run it off of the belt and use electric power for more important things.
