Anybody knows for sure that GM after decades of building engines decided to not machine the bearing surfaces to a smooth finish and that is the issue at play?
I find that hard to believe. It is more to do with indeed running to low oil viscosity, higher mileage change intervals, weaker piston rings letting more fuel by, perhaps changes in the lubrication system or increased operating temperature for efficiency. As a result 0W20 is running to thin or gets diluted and it just needs -30 or -40 allowing for some viscosity breakdown allowance.
All in all in a new build GM with that engine I would run the more viscous oil (0W40 or 5W40), what ever they say about it.
I find that hard to believe. It is more to do with indeed running to low oil viscosity, higher mileage change intervals, weaker piston rings letting more fuel by, perhaps changes in the lubrication system or increased operating temperature for efficiency. As a result 0W20 is running to thin or gets diluted and it just needs -30 or -40 allowing for some viscosity breakdown allowance.
All in all in a new build GM with that engine I would run the more viscous oil (0W40 or 5W40), what ever they say about it.
Last edited: