Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Just thought you guys might like a view from across the pond....
>...
i will be looking into this very soon possibly using an extreme valve body from rodney (would be nice if it firms shifts up too and thus reduces wear on the g'box- FWIW hard shifts are a good sign in an auto- it means the clutch bands are nice and effective- sloppy changes mean lots of wear often)
HTH
Jim
I've read nothing here that detracts from trying the mod
When do you think this will be completed on your truck?
Wouldn't it make more sense to have someone that either changed gears, or regularly crawls with his 80 do it first? That said Rick, my interest in the mod and my design for the mod revolves around the fact that I drive a supercharged truck, and modifying the locking on the torque converter is also beneficial for on-the-road boosted trucks too. I don't care to do it for low speed crawling, because that's not where the mod will give me the most benefit. YModMV
I only started this thread because of (IMO) blatant ignorance to TC operation put forth in the 'gearing' thread over a week ago. That actually turned 'on' me personally, I'm an arrogant nitwit. Hey sure, I'm good with that charge... I regularly do mods to my vehicles, all of them, including my 80. Some I share, some I don't. I do them for me, I don't sell anything here. I don't believe in a forum pecking order, and I don't believe an 80 is an exception to the experience I have in automotive modifications and my research of them.
I asked in post 1 if there was any BTDT. The answer appears to be 'maybe 1' on the 80 forum, and someone else 'looked at it' but doesn't understand how a torque converter works.
I claim this mod works, is less expensive than installing a set of gears, benefits crawling and on road boosted trucks, gives more 'claimed' downhill gains to axle gearing changes, and is less stressful on trans and brakes in downhill wheeling. I proposed this, and spent a lot of time doing more research, cuz my experience, understanding and my FSM tells me I have this dead nuts on. Even emailed a guy that did the mod to his toyota truck, with every other conceivable wheeling mod already on his truck. And the guy plays on the rocks where most of the pundits here play....
I chuckle at the challenge that I just haven't done enough. I don't claim to regularly go rock crawling with my 80. I haven't changed gears to equalize tire size, then claimed it was better in downhill descents. I run both my summer and winter tires at the stock tire size and weight. I will modify my TC lockup because my *experience* and *understanding* of torque converter operation in the 80 makes me think I should. The mod should benefit me in daily driving and towing my trailer.
I would also discourage anyone from doing *any* mod to the operation of the stock Torque Converter if they don't understand how it works. Just because the truck can take the abuse, doesn't mean it has to?
Scott J
94 FZJ80 Supercharged
How about a simple answer to my question with out the soap box. Are you or are you not doing this mod?
Pardon my immediate reluctance to see your interest in this mod as genuine? I will be modifying the conditions under which I get torque converter lockup for the obvious on-road benefits to my boosted truck. You will need to challenge someone else to do it for the obvious off-road benefits.
Cheers
Scott J
94 FZJ80 Supercharged
8 stages from unlocked to locked. Partial lockup? Absolutely!
This is not a substitute for fixing your gearing- if you're running bigger tyres then your truck will benefit from re-gearing either of the diffs or the transfer box.
Dont get hung up on the 8 stages guys (i have to say that i was NOT aware that 80s had a variabe pressure solenoid in the locking control system- its very very rare and a little pointless). For those that want to know how a TC lockup works here goes:
<snip>
You guys will konw crawling more than me (having only done 100 or so trips that need rock crawling skills) BUT at low speed to get maximum control you want an unlock TC and you raise the revs to stall point with your right foot and control your speed with your left. That way you get maximum torque low down ass well as ultimate control.
Exactly what makes me want to be selfish Rick. Even you must admit, "it wouldn't be the first time with some theoretical idea" and put up a reference modification. After recently living thru the gearing thread, I was tempted to just keep this as a mod for myself, I have a few of those on my truck too.All I'm doing is asking a simple question. I'm not challenging anyone. If you didn't follow through, it wouldn't be the first time you start with some theoretical idea and do nothing with it....
My understanding too, is that the 343 (95>) trans ECU's don't use the same inputs/outputs as the 442, and it is a more comprehensive matrixed box.
I have already designed a test box to see how the A442F Trans brain works the TC lock in DD, and will be installing it this week. I have already built the circuit to override the trans brain. That said, my testing and application will be specific to a boosted truck, which will be different than a non boosted truck because some of the Trans input parameters are modified by boost (throttle position changes specifically).
Tempting as it is to just lockup the TC with a push-on, push-off switch, I want to get an idea of what Mr. T designed into the programming first.
Why have 8 lockup settings and only use 2 of them?
Seems a positional switch would be the way to go, so you can manually control the lockup depending on the situation.
A simply on/off switch probably would be where to start though.
Backing up here.... I just went thru and edited my posts above to clear up some confusion here. I agree with Jim that the torque converter solenoid in the 442 and 343 transmissions are off/on (locked/unlocked) gate, I am speaking to the input matricies the Trans ECU uses to trigger that signal.
The main focus I have with a boosted truck for the 442 is the Throttle Position Sensor. This will also be different to the 343 transmission as I understand load uses the MAF signal as well.
Fixing your diff gearing is primarily to correct the effective gear ratio back to stock of larger tires. This mod *can* be a good substitute for 'just' diff gearing for the weekend warrior that changes wheels/tires to go wheeling. It can maximize the potential stock truck offroad behaviors, especially downhills.pugwash said:...
This is not a substitute for fixing your gearing- if you're running bigger tyres then your truck will benefit from re-gearing either of the diffs or the transfer box.
Landtank said:I'd be real surprised if your truck didn't also use the AFM to calculate load.
I can believe that. And if so, it would support that the function of the transmissions (4 solenoids on/off gate control) is the same. No surprise, but that doesn't mean that the inputs to control the 4 solenoids are the same, nor the software matrix.I don't think there is a Trans ECU in the 95+ trucks as it is integrated into the main engine ECU. But I believe that I have read that someone plugged in a 93 tranny into a 95+ truck without issue.
I believe I cleared up the 2 posts where I might have given you that wrong impression. All 4 solenoids in the A442F transmission are on/off gates, including lockup. I was speaking to the conditions on the input side of the TCM, not the output side.So what you are saying now is that the TC is either completely locked or completely open? No partial/variable lockup?
...