It is a 150 Prado follow upMaybe it’s a RAV4 extreme
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
It is a 150 Prado follow upMaybe it’s a RAV4 extreme
GX 550 is my current front runner.You nailed it and will be a happy LC250 owner. Nothing wrong with that, go for it!
I think the 4Runner TRD pro has the features you mention above. Plus, it has more ground clearance than the 250.i agree the LC is in a weird position now that it’s basically a badge engineered 4Runner. To be honest, they should have just given the US the 4Runner and been like “hey guys it’s a J250 with a different body”
The only real things that separates it, far as I can tell: 4R not available with full time 4WD AND rear locker and sway bar disconnect (though that’s not included on the 1958); and the bumper being segmented for easier replacement, and better fender/quarterpanel interface for aftermarket bumpers
They are all "real" Land Cruisers and are called such by Toyota. I suggest everyone stop parroting that "real" argument (on both sides). It's stupid.Right, the LX600 is a "real" Land Cruiser then.
So, the 550 is more heavy duty than the new US LC. Hmm. Does that make the 250 a Prado lite?
The quote imparts sarcasm. I know that Toyota considers them deserving of the name Land Cruiser. Some people don't agree, believing only the heavy duty 70 series and luxury versions are deserving. They have an arguable point, based on the past use of this model name here in the US.They are all "real" Land Cruisers and are called such by Toyota. I suggest everyone stop parroting that "real" argument. It's stupid.
I can't believe I actually feel the need to type this out in response to a relatively well-reputed forum member.
The LX300 is the upscale/luxury variant of the wagon variant of land cruiser.
The LC250 is the light duty variant.
For the GX460/470, the GX was more or less just an upscale/luxury variant of the overseas light duty land cruiser. The GX had an upgraded powerplant compared to the rest of the world's Prado, but driveline was the same. But for the first time that I'm aware, the GX550 has some driveline differences copied from the wagon variant.
So yes - per the specs, the GX550 has a bit more umpf than the US and overseas 250 light duty variant.
Is the LC250 the wagon variant? No.
Is Toyota marketing (i.e., gaslighting campaign) working to tell everyone that doesn't care about the details that the LC250 is the successor in the same model line to the 200 series Land Cruiser? Yes. But it's only the successor in name.
For clarity, the 70 series is always called "Land Cruiser 70" by the Toyota community overseas, the 200 and 300 "Land Cruiser" and the 120/150 "Prado". I guess the jury is out on what they will call the 250 but the Toyota Australia website is already very clear. In the title they combine Land Cruiser Prado and then refer to Prado only (as it is know by everybody) in the article.The quote imparts sarcasm. I know that Toyota considers them deserving of the name Land Cruiser. Some people don't agree, believing only the heavy duty 70 series and luxury versions are deserving. They have an arguable point, based on the past use of this model name here in the US.
Toyota has stated they're going forward with three lines of Land Cruiser, the luxury wagons only available as Lexus in the US, the heavy duty 70 series not available in the US and the "in between" 250/Prado. So are they gaslighting the public? I would say yes, for those not paying close attention.
Meanwhile, Australians are lamenting news that the new 4Runner will not be available for them.
It was just a minor facelift. It's still the same truck that won't meet our emissions or crash safety regulations. And most people simply won't put up with all the drawbacks of a solid front axle -- worse ride, bump steer, etc.Wasn’t the 70 just “updated” though?
It'd be interesting to hand one over a handful of them to IIHS and see how they do. @ Greg Miller - got any spare change for some research?It was just a minor facelift. It's still the same truck that won't meet our emissions or crash safety regulations. And most people simply won't put up with all the drawbacks of a solid front axle -- worse ride, bump steer, etc.
Any time you are driving on snow and you are turning, a part-time 4WD system forces its tires to slip, simply because the front of the vehicle is taking a longer path than the rear of the vehicle. A Torsen diff prevents this slippage.I get the changing from snow to wet pavement thing. Its a slight inconvenience on the last few melty days of snow but still kind of not an inconvenience to me. In the rain, ive never felt a discernable difference between the two cruisers. Ive never lost traction in the rain in either. The 100 does feel like it has slight understeer though. Especially in the snow
I like fun.we get it, you dont like fun.
If you want to do it on a track, that's awesome. If you are doing it on a public road, then you are being irresponsible.I drift on tracks in a drift car, and in the snow in my 60. My state literally has thousands of miles of public land and roads. Maybe im an irresponsible teenager.
I suspect it's the side impact collision that would doom the 70 series in crash protection. They are narrow from the outside door skin to the driver/passenger's shoulder. It's like the difference between my old '87 Integra and my old 2000 GTI. The doors on the Integra were narrow. The GTI was markedly wider -- side impact protection.It'd be interesting to hand one over a handful of them to IIHS and see how they do. @ Greg Miller - got any spare change for some research?
I disagree. I hate the spindle grille on the LX600 and it's center stack with two screens is a hot mess.The LX600 carried over a lot of the 120-series design language that I like so much. I think it actually looks better than the GX550. Not sure how the used market for a 600 will be in the future, but it might be an attractive option if I want to build a rig a decade from now.
I'm talkimg about everything behind the front clipI disagree. I hate the spindle grille on the LX600 and it's center stack with two screens is a hot mess.
FIFYIf Toyota offered the 300 series in US, would everyone be happy? Oh wait, they do. It's theGX 550LX 600.
Sorry, I've never been able to focus on any other part of that vehicle -- one look at the front clip and I'm puking...I'm talkimg about everything behind the front clip.
I would say adding an automatic transmission and a 2.8L turbo four-cylinder is more than a facelift.It was just a minor facelift. It's still the same truck that won't meet our emissions or crash safety regulations. And most people simply won't put up with all the drawbacks of a solid front axle -- worse ride, bump steer, etc.
I disagree strongly.I would say adding an automatic transmission and a 2.8L turbo four-cylinder is more than a facelift.
Speaking of the new engine, per the Toyota AUS website, demand for the V8 is so great that they are pausing orders. From their press release: "The introduction of the new powertrain will not only broaden the appeal of the 70 Series range to more customers, but helps reduce weight, improve payload and reduce fuel consumption compared to the V8, delivering on customer demands."I would say adding an automatic transmission and a 2.8L turbo four-cylinder is more than a facelift.
That maybe was supposed to change (and could change) with a lower price point. I'm a first owner at $40k-$60k but not $90k.Toyota is here to make money, not cater to 1% of buyers on ih8mud.
Most mudders are 2nd and 3rd owners anyway…. Toyota is after the 1st owner.