- Thread starter
- #121
Yeah, I like a lot about the new Tundra. Tons of torque, 87 octane, probably great MPG, *WAY* more towing and payload than the Raptor, built in lightbar, e-locker.For me, two things suck about the new Tundra TRD Pro:
1. No full-time 4wd. Chevy and Ford have AUTO 4wd that you can use on dry land. Toyota still has part-time 4wd i think.
2. Despite being hybrid, no generator option….like you see in F150 hybrid.
But #1 on your list is big for me. I live in the mountains and very often deal with snow to pavement, or snow that isn't sticking but makes the road slick, etc. The Raptor is in 4A most of the winter. It's not a deal breaker, I had a wrangler, FJC and 4Runner so I'm got plenty of RWD with selectable 4wd experience. But still, it's a very nice luxury to have in the snow or even rain.
The generator isn't such a big deal for me. I backcountry camp but usually the only power I'm using is phone or laptop charging and I have a battery pack for that, don't even need to fire up the truck. My friends sometimes bring trailers but they have solar and a gas generator if it's really hot and they need to run the AC. Granted the truck has a *WAY* bigger gas tank than a small genny and is quieter so it's a nice luxury.
The real Qs here are reliability and cost. Because you can do all of this with an F150 Tremor including 4A and 2kw generator for $66.5 MSRP (just priced it on Ford's site). If a TRD Pro is closer to $60k it's a bargain and will PROBABLY be more reliable than the 3.5 ecoboost. But if it's closer to $70k Toyota is banking a lot on people choosing them based on reliability rep since they lack some features.
Also 33's vs 35's is shameful on this truck. Hopefully you can fit 35's with a minimum of fuss.