re_guderian
SILVER Star
I'm far from the most experienced wheeler here, but have had an 80 and now two 100's. The ONLY major weak spot of the 100 is the IFS. It is the limitation on the lines you take, the routes you can and can't do, etc. It is also what makes the 100 "comfy", the king of bombing fire roads, etc. and perfectly suited to 8000 mile road trips with some wheeling interspersed.
I think we do ourselves a disservice by essentially implying that there are only two type of wheeling, fire roads that stock vehicles can do, and the "rock-crawling". There is a complete continuum in between, and often all elements are found on the same run. I DO find myself being much more cautious on which trails I go out on in the 100, especially by myself, since clearance, flex, and limited choice in lines are an issue. I find myself "following" just to make sure that the "100 will make it through", rather than having the confidence to just go for it. (I also don't have skid plates, or the highest lift possible). So yeah, a SAS would fix the one weak point of the 100. For the area where I wheel, I'm having a hard time thinking of where a locked SAS 100 would be at ANY disadvantage to an 80 series. Plus, they're all ~10 years newer than the 80's...
The ONLY hesitation would be how big of a hit to the road manners would it take? Could you retain ABS/ATRAC, or are you forced to pony up another 3K for lockers? (assuming you don't start with a '99 LC w/factory rear locked). It will obviously be a downgrade on pavement and mild-moderate wheeling where the clearance and travel of the SA aren't absolutely needed.
It's just a trade-off, that's all. It opens up some doors, and closes others. The LX600 is sweet, I'm sure the SAS'd LX will be too...
I think we do ourselves a disservice by essentially implying that there are only two type of wheeling, fire roads that stock vehicles can do, and the "rock-crawling". There is a complete continuum in between, and often all elements are found on the same run. I DO find myself being much more cautious on which trails I go out on in the 100, especially by myself, since clearance, flex, and limited choice in lines are an issue. I find myself "following" just to make sure that the "100 will make it through", rather than having the confidence to just go for it. (I also don't have skid plates, or the highest lift possible). So yeah, a SAS would fix the one weak point of the 100. For the area where I wheel, I'm having a hard time thinking of where a locked SAS 100 would be at ANY disadvantage to an 80 series. Plus, they're all ~10 years newer than the 80's...
The ONLY hesitation would be how big of a hit to the road manners would it take? Could you retain ABS/ATRAC, or are you forced to pony up another 3K for lockers? (assuming you don't start with a '99 LC w/factory rear locked). It will obviously be a downgrade on pavement and mild-moderate wheeling where the clearance and travel of the SA aren't absolutely needed.
It's just a trade-off, that's all. It opens up some doors, and closes others. The LX600 is sweet, I'm sure the SAS'd LX will be too...