LX570-Tire type/size/ride and overall useablity recommendations (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

I may not need AT tires, but that is what I will get. Maybe something with a less aggressive tread pattern. I don’t know if I can swing a tire/wheel upgrade at the moment though, I’m also in the process of fixing the time cover leak. That has consumed a little more of my preventative maintenance budget than I anticipated.
I'm sure you don't need help spending your money, but have you seen these? Tirerack has the AlphaEquipt older models on clearance. Decent looking wheel with some nifty features and perfect offset for running 33-35" tires on a 200. The (17x8.5 ET35)

If these had been available early last year at these prices, I would have not bothered with the TRD wheels.


Then slap on 5 Load C ATs and call it a day. Man, tire prices are shooting up. My Toyos are almost $100/tire more than they were a year ago when i bought them.

The nice thing about those 17" wheels is you can check your local Craiglsist/FB Marketplace and find some 17" take offs from a Jeep Rubicon (5 wheels/tires for $1k-$1.2k is a pretty common price, sometimes even with the wheels which you can flip to save even more money). There is always a set or two available near me. They usually are in sets of 5 in LT285/70R17 Load C. In my neck of the woods, it's always either KO2s or Falken AT3Ws (Or the the MT version of both those tires). With the new Broncos coming out, there may be some other options in takeoffs.
 
My tires are brand new and have no issue wonder what I could sell them for… I wish I’d have gone a size up last swap.
I wouldn't do a 34+" without a gear ratio change but many have. Personal preference on the tradeoffs ($ vs upgrade order).
 
I wouldn't do a 34+" without a gear ratio change but many have. Personal preference on the tradeoffs ($ vs upgrade order).

You know, my 8 speed doesnt like going above 1200 rpm and is always pissing me off. It might just fix my problem.
 
oh yeah, the 8 speed. no issues with 34" on the 8 speed. It's got a very nice 1st ratio.
 
I may not need AT tires, but that is what I will get. Maybe something with a less aggressive tread pattern. I don’t know if I can swing a tire/wheel upgrade at the moment though, I’m also in the process of fixing the time cover leak. That has consumed a little more of my preventative maintenance budget than I anticipated.
Well ok. I was just answering the question you posed. You would be better off with a good all season that can handle light to moderate off road but will have much better road manors and wet weather performance. Like: Michelin defenders, conti terrianContact (non-AT version),…
 
I'm sure you don't need help spending your money, but have you seen these? Tirerack has the AlphaEquipt older models on clearance. Decent looking wheel with some nifty features and perfect offset for running 33-35" tires on a 200. The (17x8.5 ET35)

If these had been available early last year at these prices, I would have not bothered with the TRD wheels.


Then slap on 5 Load C ATs and call it a day. Man, tire prices are shooting up. My Toyos are almost $100/tire more than they were a year ago when i bought them.

The nice thing about those 17" wheels is you can check your local Craiglsist/FB Marketplace and find some 17" take offs from a Jeep Rubicon (5 wheels/tires for $1k-$1.2k is a pretty common price, sometimes even with the wheels which you can flip to save even more money). There is always a set or two available near me. They usually are in sets of 5 in LT285/70R17 Load C. In my neck of the woods, it's always either KO2s or Falken AT3Ws (Or the the MT version of both those tires). With the new Broncos coming out, there may be some other options in takeoffs.
Well thanks for the heads up. I’ve had methods (17” +35 offset) on order since Sept. just canceling my order for a set of these. Called tire rack and Alpha Equipt. Both said that the tundra center bore will not fit over the 200 front hubs.
 
Last edited:
Well thanks for the heads up. I’ve had methods (17” +35 offset) on order since Sept. just canceled my order and bought a set of these and saved $800 over the methods with my military discount.

Wow those are a steal right now for anyone needing 17s!

Good find @lx200inAR
 
I've had AE 17" 35mm 'Echo' on my rig since after christmas. Working awesome. The wheels are solid, but the 2nd valve hole is truly awesome. It allows for install of the Apex Rapid deflator, which is really an amazing thing for air down. Like unbelievable! You just put you TPMS in the shielded valve hole, and the apex in the other.
 
Well thanks for the heads up. I’ve had methods (17” +35 offset) on order since Sept. just canceling my order for a set of these. Called tire rack and Alpha Equipt. Both said that the tundra center bore will not fit over the 200 front hubs.
@grinchy has the installed, you can ask him.
 
I've had AE 17" 35mm 'Echo' on my rig since after christmas. Working awesome. The wheels are solid, but the 2nd valve hole is truly awesome. It allows for install of the Apex Rapid deflator, which is really an amazing thing for air down. Like unbelievable! You just put you TPMS in the shielded valve hole, and the apex in the other.

That deflator sounds awesome. I think I'm in my happy place with a captive core removal tool, but still more a PITA than I like.
 
I’m looking at toyo AT3 in 285/70-17. I tow a 6800 lb camper all summer I was going to go with the LT load C. I also do quite a lot of miles Aired down in the sand/mud/tundra/lose rock. Looking at it the E load rated ones are only 1lb heavier per tire. Does that seem odd to others?

Anyone have thought in C vs E?
 
That deflator sounds awesome. I think I'm in my happy place with a captive core removal tool, but still more a PITA than I like.
it's similar to a captive core tool, but instead of remove cap/screw on/pull/vent/push/screw off/replace cap, it has reduced the task to remove cap/pull up/push down/replace cap. The rate at which they dump air has to be seen to believe. I'll take a video sometime . . .
 
I’m looking at toyo AT3 in 285/70-17. I tow a 6800 lb camper all summer I was going to go with the LT load C. I also do quite a lot of miles Aired down in the sand/mud/tundra/lose rock. Looking at it the E load rated ones are only 1lb heavier per tire. Does that seem odd to others?

Anyone have thought in C vs E?

As you actually have a load range choice in that tire size... I'd vote for LT-C. Doesn't necessarily mean they are less durable or less puncture resistant as they obviously have much of the same mass and content by weight. The trade is likely that it has internal cords configured and designed for less max inflation pressure. Should provide more compliance. Then again, you're running a 17" wheel with lots of sidewall so does it need much help with compliance?
 
I’m looking at toyo AT3 in 285/70-17. I tow a 6800 lb camper all summer I was going to go with the LT load C. I also do quite a lot of miles Aired down in the sand/mud/tundra/lose rock. Looking at it the E load rated ones are only 1lb heavier per tire. Does that seem odd to others?

Anyone have thought in C vs E?

I would say the C is perfect middle ground but let me ask first do you know your rig curb weight? I can get my Cs in that exact size super soft and super firm. I never imagine needing more than 50PSI, 40 is already stiff enough for just about any load i can carry. I can pretty much completely eliminate bulge by 42 PSI unladen which is kind of nuts considering the rim width.

I like having that range though its kind of best of both worlds IMO.
 
As you actually have a load range choice in that tire size... I'd vote for LT-C. Doesn't necessarily mean they are less durable or less puncture resistant as they obviously have much of the same mass and content by weight. The trade is likely that it has internal cords configured and designed for less max inflation pressure. Should provide more compliance. Then again, you're running a 17" wheel with lots of sidewall so does it need much help with compliance?
That was my thought as well. Thank you.
 
I have no ego in looks.
I have the tundra wheels and 275/60r18 Michelin road tire.
I have remote property off 100 year old logging road. Steep sections are 23 degrees with some rocks that like to eat jeep pumpkins.

Having tundras and Tacomas lifted and locked, I am now happy to have an lx.

the Michelin tires have done just as well as mudders and a/ts regardless of mud and rain. When it’s iced up I put chains on all 4 corners. I put spacers to clear the uca and lines.

I live in Fort Collins and practice in Wyoming, so am mostly paved and the quiet smooth ride is nice.

Look up the guy on expedition portal that found the same thing once he got over what others thought of his street tires, he does overland and finds road tires 99% as good on everything that his a/ts and mudders were.
 
Has anyone successfully fit a 17" wheel (25mm OS) with 295/70R17 LT tires like the BFG KO2? That tire is 33.3" in diameter, pretty close to the 285/70R18 listed earlier.
 
Has anyone successfully fit a 17" wheel (25mm OS) with 295/70R17 LT tires like the BFG KO2? That tire is 33.3" in diameter, pretty close to the 285/70R18 listed earlier.

This is a straightforward fit for the lx. You’ll likely have to remove the front mud flap and massage the fender liner. Both are minor.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom