Looking for advice on fixing leaf bracket angle

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

So bikersmurf. What do you mean by park in a ditch at an angle?

Yes... Two wheels in the ditch for hours, and then alternate.
 
I agree with the flying Eddy: longer shackles might help - "might" because it's difficult to predict from here how the spring will settle under load - I'd look into the 4-Plus shackles from Man-a-Fre

- but I definately would also do something about tucking those dangling wires away (the good news being you got factory blinker wiring ;))

and, by the way, don't call it an fj; out of all of the possible fjsomethings, it's a 40 :doh:
 
Last edited:
Longer shackles may make it a little harder to invert, but longer shackles alone never improve shackle angles unless the springs were way too long - opposite of the OP's issue.
 
I don't remember my rear shackle angle with my 4" rough country but I found an old pic and all the leads are the same size, just the fronts are 1 leaf beefier
 
Here's that pic
image-360378145.webp
 
I recommend just relocating the rear shackle pivot point, that's what I did along with a reversal in the front and I have teraflex's front and rear which also double as an anti inversion shackle if you're worried about it
 
Put 400 lbs of camping gear in the rear and go enjoy offroading and the outdoors. When you are done they will be a little better. Cuz you are doing most of the mentioned suggestions and enjoying you time as well.
 
That spring angle dosn't look that bad. Drive it some and it will settle to the perfect angle. With use, springs get longer not shorter.
Your first picture shows how easy it can be to invert a shackle. A drive down a bumpy dirt road and bam, bent or broken spring.
 
I agree with what most nearly everyone has been saying here: with your vehicle on the ground, the shackle angle really isn't that bad. Again, while the "perfect shackle angle" is a debatable thing, you want your shackle to rest slightly aft of vertical in repose (rather than slightly fore of vertical, like it currently is). This will allow your springs plenty of flex and travel in the right direction.

Loading it with weight whilst it's static (NOT loading it and taking it wheeling) might be a good experiment too. It should create the necessary strain on the vehicle's springs to see how they behave. If they naturally flex aft rather than fore (in an inverted position), you may actually not require the longer shackles, at all. You can then try wheeling it, so as to get the springs to "settle". IF your springs flex towards an inverted position, I'd recommend you NOT wheel it whilst hoping for it to get better on its own. Worst case scenario: inverted shackles may shear away their mounts from the chassis. NOT the most desirable thing when you're on a trail. :D

IF the natural tendency of your springs whilst loaded is to invert the shackle, you can either a) get longer shackles b) flatten (and thus lengthen) the springs (which I wouldn't recommend, since it negates the concept of "lift springs") or c) reposition the shackle mount slightly fore of the current location. I'd probably go with a).

From the looks of the shackle angle on your unladen vehicle while it's parked on the ground, a longer shackle WILL address your problem, probably. Because it'll create more leverage, the flex in the springs will force the shackle backward, and the chances of inversion will be reduced. It'll also provide you with a little more lift, which, since you're looking to lift the vehicle anyways...can't really be a bad thing.

In any case, it'd be a wise thing to sort the suspension out before you seriously embark on any travels...because of the possibility of it souring any experiences you might have (and its potential to burn a large hole in your pocket, subsequently).

By the way, did you check to see if the spring stacks are off-centric (ie, comprised of unequal halves from the centre bolt outwards)?

Whoa. Holy Lengthy Monologue on my part!

:beer:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom