Thanks for the explanation on the sway bar issue. My tired and blood shot eyes skipped right over the flex restriction part.
Here's the deal though.
Some anti sway and restriction is necessary to force the fronts pliability, in my opinion, unless on a ramp.
My justification for pursuing anti sway options isn't solely for on road or off camber stability, but to make the front do a little work, too.
Even with the SE arms that, in theory (yet remains to be proven with longer shocks), allow for more articulation than the OEs, the most variation I can get from one side to the other (using jack stands and gravity, WITHOUT the vehicles weight, which is a huge component and why I've not eluded to the before) is 4" with the DS being 5" lower than PS.
That's really an irrelevant dimension, because its missing a huge factor being 1/2 of the 5500lb vehicle, but based on seeing what little it possible with the short shocks I have, that, in my idiot observation, put the coils into a bind sooner than what longer shocks will, there's nothing to force the front to move, except the coils against the frame and gravity.
I haven't slept in a Holiday Inn in sometime, for the record.
How do you think a stiffer sway bar would affect a truck with say a 2" lift? Since a 2" lift is not going to flex like the taller lifts would it limit flex even more?
All my references are to a rear only on a 80 that a front sway isn't an option, and my opinion here is exactly that, opinion.
I don't think at 2" the sway negatively impacts enough to warrant a change, personally.
The front, in my opinion, being removed off road is a must, but (short of the low hanging arms) don't think there's much that could be improved by stiffening the bar.