Featured 100 - spressomon (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

As some of you know we had, apart of this new rear shock project, an exacerbating near 3-month calamity with the folks at King. That's what led me to Glenn and Radflo. DesertRun provided a great reference for me and that provided the impetus to change! It also helped to hear of Glenn's second to none approach to customer service before and after the sale! And his promise, even though my shock order was custom and involved a special request high misalignment lower bearing he had not devised a mount heretofore, of 3-week turn-around was spot on as well as his price quote! Impressive!

The new suspension tweaks, so far anyway and with only 600-miles on them to date, have proven to be worth the effort! As most of you know I mounted Fox shocks long before Fox, King, Radflo or anyone else besides OME, had an OEM type/bolt on fit. However the #8 spherical bearings and a heavy rig were a mismatch from day one and I got tired of replacing them up to 2X per year. So the impetus for the new rear shocks was mainly to get to #12 spherical bearing mounts for hopefully improved bearing life and decreased service intervals.

Another one of our goals was to eventually eliminate the air bags. Now there have been numerous threads where I have provided my "thumbs up" opinion about air bags being the shnitz for variable load carrying ability. And for a cheap easy adjustable suspension for varying loads they work very well, all things in considered, on pavement. But left me wanting for more shock control when off-pavement.

Like most things there are plusses and minuses to the airbags. They do limit articulation somewhat although I could live with that negative. But with the required 25lbs psi or so in the bags the Fox 2.0 just ran short of damping ability especially noticeable off-highway where the terrain changes are not as "engineered". Of course with slow enough speed this shortcoming is easily managed. And therein lies the challenge: Slowing down :D.

So the theory is to, when the KK is connected to the SpressoWagon, increase the nitrogen psi to 350-425psi to provide two things: Increased effective rear suspension lift/load carrying capacity and a corresponding increase in compression valving. Based on last weekend's relatively short test I was amazed and pleasantly surprised at the results.

I wanted to get a baseline for comparison so I didn't alter the Radflo's nitrogen charge; I left it at 200psi. But with Glenn's tune and the larger 2.5" shock bodies the shocks did just fine without an increase in psi. To be fair I didn't get to do the type of testing I wanted...those of you with :princess: in tow know what I mean...and last weekend's foray was no different ;). But even with the lower :princess: friendly speeds I could easily feel the new Radflos made a significant improvement in control with the KK in tow even with "0" pressure in the Airlift bags. Quite impressive actually.

Glenn valved my Radflos with nothing more than a quick discussion about GVW, the Kimberley Kamper's overall weight and tongue weight, my driving style and my overall expectations to him. On road I couldn't ask for anything more or better. Overall ride quality has been noticeably improved; especially over expansion joints and rough pavement. But damping has also been improved with the Radflos. So the result has been win-win: Better ride quality AND better damping.

Apart of the Radflo install Sam needed to redesign both upper and lower rear shock mounts to accommodate 1" longer shock travel as well as about 1.5" longer compressed shock length. With my new 1" body lift in place he was able to raise the lower and upper shock mounts and provide better cycling angles for the new shocks. He was also able to net approximately 1.5-2" more droop out with the new set-up while retaining maximum compression! Compressed travel remains about the same as before.

Along with the Radflos I decided to follow DesertRun's lead with the Timbren compression bump stops. I actually mounted the rear Timbrens while the Fox shocks were on the rig; they made a considerable improvement in compression control! Originally I was going to have Sam graft Light Racing jounce shocks up front for better overall suspension control but with his time constraints and my impatience (the rig had already been in his shop for almost a month...) I pulled the plug on that idea and opted for the soft Timbrens up front too.

The front Timbrens certainly offer a smoother bottom out of the front suspension but certainly aren't active like the Light Racing units would have provided. So the Light Racing project has been back burner-ed but not eliminated from "the list".

I hope the relatively huge #12 spherical bearings provide increased durability...but only time will tell! But so far I am very impressed with the Radflo shocks.
Radflo 1.jpg
DSC_5724.jpg
DSC_5734.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nice update Dan! Updates to this thread are almost as good as a new issue of Overland Journal!

With the inverted shocks, are you concerned at all about debris getting into the seal without a boot on it? Looks pretty exposed.
 
Thanks for the compliments Dennis!

The shocks are mounted with the bodies up and piston shaft down...typical of any mono-tube type shock. Although these types of shocks don't care about whether the shaft is mounted up or down the remotes are much better protected with the bodies mounted upside.

The behind the axle mounts have proven to be significantly more shielded than the OEM placement. In front of the axle the shocks got badly peened. Whereas, even after the huge off-road miles I've driven, the Fox shock shafts were still in excellent condition.

Shock boots are a double edged sword: They can trap moisture from condensation and with my rear of axle mounts I have found them not worth the trouble. For those not familiar with Fox, King, Radflo, etc. type shocks there is an outer "wiper" that swipes grit and moisture away before it can get to the underlying seal. Typical of hydraulic cylinder type construction.

For in-front of axle OEM mounts I would suggest some type of shaft guard possibly made from rubber belting ziptied to the shock body to keep them from getting peened/pitted.
 
Last edited:
Do the radflos require limiting straps if you used them in the front?
 
Do the radflos require limiting straps if you used them in the front?

All of the mono-tube type shocks will need some type of down travel limiter for the front of our 100's. Limit straps are dynamic in the sense they keep stretching with subsequent applied loads; even the triple layer Mastercraft's: Just the nature of nylon and the mechanical advantage our front end design has over them.

So for the 100-Series the shock should serve as the down travel limiter as well as new straps matched to that travel for spreading the load. I've figured this out through much trial and error and my current set up works perfectly.
 
Are you still using the fox shox in the front?

Do you have any pics of the upper shock mounts?
 
Awesome, very nice setup! I will most likely be going this direction but have yet to decide between king, fox, or radflo. They all seem to be about the same price and have the same features minus king's adjustable compression?

You may have answered this already but why go with a custom length when you could get something off the shelf that would work aside from the 12mm joints?

Also, if you don't mind me asking, what did this pair set you back. Curious to see if they charged any extra for the customization.

Thanks,
-Ryan
 
Ryan: I wanted something more out of a shock before anyone was offering a stock location/bolt on solution (except for OME) for the 100. So I didn't really have another option at that time...other than waiting. Today both King and Radflo offer stock location, bolt-on solutions for mono-tube high performance, tune-able and fully rebuildable shocks.

And I don't care for post style mounts and hence my original decision and commitment to the custom mounts became an 'easier pill to swallow' at the time.

The additional travel of my 11" Radflos maximize what my suspension is capable of and then some. In retrospect I could have gotten by quite nicely, given these mount locations, with a 10" travel Radflo and it would have met my suspension goals; however no regrets. Please contact Glenn for pricing.

And Glenn's parts pricing (seal rebuild kits) is in line with Fox; very reasonable. King...not so much. Another bonus for me: I already had the master tune kit for Fox and the valve plates are interchangeable with my new Radflo shocks. But Glenn did such an incredible job pre-tuning these shocks for my application I, at this time, don't see the need to change the current tune.

From a performance perspective, barring any custom work you may desire, you can't go wrong with Fox, King or Radflo. But from a customer support perspective Glenn and his Radflo organization are significantly more customer satisfaction focussed right now: Actually from my perspective there's no comparison. Time will tell how well the shocks hold up and continue to satisfy.
 
Last edited:
One of my latest projects. Full report coming after bed-in and testing.
Stoptech wheel photo.jpg
 
One of my latest projects. Full report coming after bed-in and testing.

Looks sweet, hope it improves the pedal feel.

Is it front only?
 
Looks sweet, hope it improves the pedal feel.

Is it front only?


Yes. Stoptech is currently working on a rear set-up for the 100...
 
I just got back from bedding in the new rotors and pads. One word: Incredible.

High & very firm pedal with an incredible amount of modulation and peak stopping power. No more double pumping either (overhauled the M/C apart of this install...thanks again Skidoo for your very well documented M/C overhaul procedure!).

Done.
 
314mm x 32mm stock; 355mm x 32mm Stoptech.
DSC_6035.jpg
DSC_6063.jpg
 
holy giant brakes batman! I'm more impressed by the size of that caliper than the rotor! they don't look that big behind your 35s on 18's, but when you compare it to stock... wow!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom