I recently went out on an camping trip with the family where I had my battery go dead. It was just a slight inconvenience in this situation, but I can certainly imagine a trip where the repercussions are far more serious. It's got me considering a dual battery setup.
So I've been exploring the dual battery configs out there and as far as I can tell, most everyone goes with two like batteries, in a dual bank configuration. One as a starter battery and one as a 'house' battery.
While I can definitely see the merits of this configuration, a limitation is that the total capacity for each of the functions that each bank serves, is limited to half the total combined capacity. For example, the fridge or aux lights can only access 50% of the total battery capacity before running out. Or car stereo and interior fans can again only access 50% before running out.
Why then, would one not want to setup the batteries in a primary / backup configuration. Where the primary batt and backup batt has an 80%/20% capacity split. For example, I'd get a group 31 or 65 primary, and a motorcycle type battery for the backup starter battery. Is there a tragic flaw in this that I'm not seeing? This would allow whatever function of my car that I'm using, to have full access to more reserve capacity.
Couple additional bonuses is that I'm less likely to deep discharge any particular bank. And I can find a place in my AHC LX to accept a smaller battery underhood.
Thoughts?
So I've been exploring the dual battery configs out there and as far as I can tell, most everyone goes with two like batteries, in a dual bank configuration. One as a starter battery and one as a 'house' battery.
While I can definitely see the merits of this configuration, a limitation is that the total capacity for each of the functions that each bank serves, is limited to half the total combined capacity. For example, the fridge or aux lights can only access 50% of the total battery capacity before running out. Or car stereo and interior fans can again only access 50% before running out.
Why then, would one not want to setup the batteries in a primary / backup configuration. Where the primary batt and backup batt has an 80%/20% capacity split. For example, I'd get a group 31 or 65 primary, and a motorcycle type battery for the backup starter battery. Is there a tragic flaw in this that I'm not seeing? This would allow whatever function of my car that I'm using, to have full access to more reserve capacity.
Couple additional bonuses is that I'm less likely to deep discharge any particular bank. And I can find a place in my AHC LX to accept a smaller battery underhood.
Thoughts?
Last edited:
. In any case, I think every now and then, it's a good idea to charge your AGM batteries with an AGM compatible charger.