- Thread starter
- #41
Hey Ben,
Remember that with the rear 4 link you are dealing with a rectangle (as viewed from the side). As the rear (axle side) of the rectangle moves down, the line formed between the rear points of the control arms stays primarily vertical . That line also happens to be perpendicular to the diff pinion. What that means is that as you lift the vehicle the diff pinion continues, for the most part, to point forward and below the t-case pinion. If you lengthen the upper control arms it will point the diff pinion back up at the t-case. That means you have little pinion angle to deal with at the diff and you have effectively reduced the angle at the t-case as well. So long as your stock drive shaft is in good shape it should be able to cope with the angle unless you are going over 6" of lift. There is only so much angle the shaft can handle, as you pointed out. If you were going over 6" you should still rotate the axle up to zero out the diff pinion angle. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong. It has been a loooong time since I took geometry.
![]()
Don't sweat an argument, you've got good points! I agree that the 4 link should move in a rectangle as the axle moves down. I made my assesment because looking at my pinion with no upper arm adjustments the pinion is facing up towards the t-case. If the rectangle holds true my pinion should still be facing foward but it's not, which is why I concluded the axle must move in an arch. I also put in upper arm drop brackets, which in essence shortened the arms. The pinion angle then got closer to the t-case angle and my noise got quieter.
I also agree that I'm no expert and no geomety wiz so maybe Slee can step in here. Though I know for sure my rear shaft grrs and vibrates so I need at least a DC shaft, if not also the adjusters.
Last edited: