Distributor Position (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

For what it’s worth: On our 1970 with the original F engine, I’ve tried setting the timing at 7 degrees advance and it runs like crap. At about 28 degrees advance I get about 22 vacuum and a nice idle at 650.
I have a similar experience. I hook up a vacuum gauge and set timing that way. I don’t know how advanced it is, but it’s well beyond the 7° and it’s a happy motor there. When I can see the BB in the window it runs rough.
 
Okay. Have you used a vacuum gauge to assess intake manifold pressure?
@Mace and @Mark W I completely agree, and I would very much appreciate any suggestions. But after pulling and re-stabbing the distributor countless times, I haven't a clue as to what is the issue. I would be much happier if it were a 7 degrees advance. But doing so means I have to turn the idle way up to reach 600-650. The main reason I gave up chasing this issue is that the engine actually sems to perform quite well on the current setting. Starts quickly, idles smoothly with no choke, good vacuum... Sorry for the hijack.... :)
No worries. Sounds like we have a similar issue. Although even when I advance mine it’s not what I would call smooth. I’ve been playing with the distributor and carb adjustments all day trying to figure it out.
 
I've taken pressure at the brake booster, but not directly from the manifold I guess.
Not trying to be an oral surgeon here, but maybe if you posted the pressures as you move from 7 deg BTDC to higher numbers, that might help the mavens of FJ40 technology here help out with a diagnosis.
 
Multi-function timing guns are pretty inexpensive these days. I got one off of Amazon That does everything.
 
I have my advance set at 20 degrees and it runs really well. When it's too low, it doesn't run rough, but I get some hiccups while driving.

I bought a digital timing gun from Harbor Freight that allows me to enter my desired target advance number, and then I line up the flywheel mark to TDC, which actually sets the advance to 20. It's so much easier than my old gun!

IMG_0162.jpg
 
@Mace and @Mark W I completely agree, The main reason I gave up chasing this issue is that the engine actually sems to perform quite well on the current setting. Starts quickly, idles smoothly with no choke, good vacuum...
I'm in sorta the same boat. The engine is not original and not quite stock. I was not surprised when my BB disappeared, and I just timed by vacuum. First the early vac advance dizzy then a 60 series big cap because all the cool kids had one. And I'd just time to best vacuum and then back it off a tad. And carry a 12mm ratcheting endwrench in the center console.
Then I got a new-fangled digital timing light and found that I was running at 33* BTDC. Even I could figure that something was wrong with my set up. So I replaced the non-functioning double diaphragm advancer unit on the dizzy with a new single diaphragm advancer from @4Cruisers, fiddled with the advance springs for a while and chose a pair that gives full advance (according to the enclosed instructions and my SOP) at around 3K RPM. I was able to retard timing to about 20*, it's happier at 22. I pull about 16" Hg at a 600 RPM idle. I'm just over 3k elevation and this engine is 20 years old. I've been promising it valve job for 10 years. I'll get to that any day now.
I'm thinking that the timing creep is sorta normal. Don't know why, maybe the gas, maybe just age, perhaps the global warming. Maybe they ran better with more advance when brand new and the FSM is a lie.
 
I'm in sorta the same boat. The engine is not original and not quite stock. I was not surprised when my BB disappeared, and I just timed by vacuum. First the early vac advance dizzy then a 60 series big cap because all the cool kids had one. And I'd just time to best vacuum and then back it off a tad. And carry a 12mm ratcheting endwrench in the center console.
Then I got a new-fangled digital timing light and found that I was running at 33* BTDC. Even I could figure that something was wrong with my set up. So I replaced the non-functioning double diaphragm advancer unit on the dizzy with a new single diaphragm advancer from @4Cruisers, fiddled with the advance springs for a while and chose a pair that gives full advance (according to the enclosed instructions and my SOP) at around 3K RPM. I was able to retard timing to about 20*, it's happier at 22. I pull about 16" Hg at a 600 RPM idle. I'm just over 3k elevation and this engine is 20 years old. I've been promising it valve job for 10 years. I'll get to that any day now.
I'm thinking that the timing creep is sorta normal. Don't know why, maybe the gas, maybe just age, perhaps the global warming. Maybe they ran better with more advance when brand new and the FSM is a lie.
Same here. One of the long-time guru's here told me once that it is a 54 year-old motor, with all of the concomitant wear and tear, it would be abnormal if it still tuned to factory spec. Setting timing on the BB requires turning the idle way up to get it to 650. Moreover, when accelerating it hesitates badly. All and all, the motor seems entirely happy at about 28 degrees advance. It does have Petronix ignition, but I'm not sure if that makes any difference. I admit that I'm abit envious of the BB crowd but I've reconciled that our situation it is what it is. :)
 
I'm in sorta the same boat. The engine is not original and not quite stock. I was not surprised when my BB disappeared, and I just timed by vacuum. First the early vac advance dizzy then a 60 series big cap because all the cool kids had one. And I'd just time to best vacuum and then back it off a tad. And carry a 12mm ratcheting endwrench in the center console.
Then I got a new-fangled digital timing light and found that I was running at 33* BTDC. Even I could figure that something was wrong with my set up. So I replaced the non-functioning double diaphragm advancer unit on the dizzy with a new single diaphragm advancer from @4Cruisers, fiddled with the advance springs for a while and chose a pair that gives full advance (according to the enclosed instructions and my SOP) at around 3K RPM. I was able to retard timing to about 20*, it's happier at 22. I pull about 16" Hg at a 600 RPM idle. I'm just over 3k elevation and this engine is 20 years old. I've been promising it valve job for 10 years. I'll get to that any day now.
I'm thinking that the timing creep is sorta normal. Don't know why, maybe the gas, maybe just age, perhaps the global warming. Maybe they ran better with more advance when brand new and the FSM is a lie.
Good information. Thank you !
 
I would make sure the mechanical advance is working properly like in the video. It maybe stuck or the springs are weak or disconnected and the weights are not returning. You can rev the engine up to about 3000rpm and watch if the timing advances and note the rpms once the mechanical advance is all in and that it returns at idle. Be sure to disconnect the vacuum advance and cap the hose. Using a timing light with the advance function is required to see total advance.
 
Last edited:
Somewhere deep in Mud is a recommendation to start at about 13⁰ which is about where the BB hits the edge of the sight glass on desmogged rigs.
 
I would make sure the mechanical advance is working properly like in the video. It maybe stuck or the springs are weak or disconnected and the weights are not returning. You can rev the engine up to about 3000rpm and watch if the timing advances and note the rpms once the mechanical advance is all in and that it returns at idle. Be sure to disconnect the vacuum advance and cap the hose. Using a timing light with the advance function is required to see total advance.
Thanks for the tip. I will check that out also.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom