I like my 315s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Oh hell no....that's why "nobody's" putting lift kits on their rigs and cutting the hell out of their wheel wells or pullin' their hair out to get pinion & caster angles correctedThis is not a tire or a tyre thread.![]()
go 6" arms. you wont be sorryThanks for all the information hear. So based on three hours of reading this thread, I am seriously leaning toward Delta arms and delta rear pan hard bracket. Seems like many have had success with similar set ups. My 97 build started in 2007 with 106K on the clock and I added OME heavy front - medium rear springs and caster bushings, but it was never a great handling lift even after all the hype from 2006. I have added a lot of weight since that has helped like bumpers, sliders, skids, rack, fridge, dual batteries etc. I have since only added OME heavy rear springs, brake line extensions, brakes, axel seals, trunnion bearings, bump stops etc. to the suspension and a few sets of 35" tires over the years. Now I have a pronounced death wobble under heavy breaking. So I suspect it is time for new parts after 23 years on original parts and 140K on the rig. I just purchased all new tie rod ends, new adjustable front pan hard and new wheel bearings. I suspect the pan hard as the biggest culprit given the age and condition of the bushings, but want to tidy it all up so it handles like new. I have not yet determined what springs and shocks to add given my heavy loading, but want to start by fixing the handling and wobble first. Then go onto springs, shocks, 4.88s, rear control arms, and other misc. bushings etc for cash flow, since this is a toy not a daily driver so hard to justify all at once.
It seems that the 4" radius arms would be an OK option for current springs and good for future plans to solve my wobble and handling for now. I want to be at about 3-4" of lift at final droop when loaded when done. Does this seem reasonable based on the experience of those who have them?
I’m going through the same process right now with my cruiser. Every inch of lift looks like it’s adding close to 2 degrees of caster. I’m running J’s with a second battery and F+R bumpers. Just got my alignment checked and I’m - 2 degrees. The 2” arms add 4.5 degrees of caster and would bring me within specs. 4” arms add 8 degrees giving me too much caster. Figure out where you want to go with lift and contact Dave..He responds quickly and is very helpfulThanks for all the information hear. So based on three hours of reading this thread, I am seriously leaning toward Delta arms and delta rear pan hard bracket. Seems like many have had success with similar set ups. My 97 build started in 2007 with 106K on the clock and I added OME heavy front - medium rear springs and caster bushings, but it was never a great handling lift even after all the hype from 2006. I have added a lot of weight since that has helped like bumpers, sliders, skids, rack, fridge, dual batteries etc. I have since only added OME heavy rear springs, brake line extensions, brakes, axel seals, trunnion bearings, bump stops etc. to the suspension and a few sets of 35" tires over the years. Now I have a pronounced death wobble under heavy breaking. So I suspect it is time for new parts after 23 years on original parts and 140K on the rig. I just purchased all new tie rod ends, new adjustable front pan hard and new wheel bearings. I suspect the pan hard as the biggest culprit given the age and condition of the bushings, but want to tidy it all up so it handles like new. I have not yet determined what springs and shocks to add given my heavy loading, but want to start by fixing the handling and wobble first. Then go onto springs, shocks, 4.88s, rear control arms, and other misc. bushings etc for cash flow, since this is a toy not a daily driver so hard to justify all at once.
It seems that the 4" radius arms would be an OK option for current springs and good for future plans to solve my wobble and handling for now. I want to be at about 3-4" of lift at final droop when loaded when done. Does this seem reasonable based on the experience of those who have them?
Then go with the 2.5/2.0 tapered Dobinson’s with a 1” / 30mm spacer or whatever thickness you want to dial in exact desired ride height. The 3.5/3.0 version will net 4” lift alone on a rig that has bumpers and all the normal armor. With 4” lift and 4-5* positive castor angle you’ll need a DC front shaft for sure. With larger tires and 4” lift strong castor numbers are a good thing.Nice, sounds like you have been doing your homework then. Beware tho the 144/145 sound like they run closer to 4". I don't get why others here go with the other Dobinson springs but guessing this is why. Just a total guess and relying on what others report but one of the reasons we decided the 4" delta arms. I know most don't get it and think I'm crazy but if the 144/145 IS closer to 4" I'm tempted to cut them down a bit and add a 1" body I already have on hand if I don't like the lift/ ride but I also just jumped to 37's, IMO 4" is too tall for 35's. and 3.5" is about spot on for TRUE 35's. My target is 4"-4.5" but not all in the way of springs. Unfortunately I felt pressured to move on something with all the spring issues from down under but sure I can live with it if a true 4" it was more than I was shooting for. If you have a year of so to buy time you may think the slinky but I don't and will not go that route until they get there ongoing problems sorted. Just my .02, especially since your likely to only be able to get a "KIT" unless upgrading the rears due to bad decision on original purchase.
The 4" arms will handle this as well as I constantly hear over Caster correction is fine and Dave will also tell you this, you just don't want the opposite.
They are amazing aren't they! So stoked i went with the @Delta VS kit.Just got my radius arms installed and they completely changed the driving dynamic of my 80. No more squirrelliness on the highway at all. Also recently installed the panhard bracket. Couldn't be happier. Thanks guys!
Totally agree. They are expensive but worth it for how great the truck drives after installing them with all the other suspension parts. The DeltaVS customer service was also pretty good. Great companyJust got my radius arms installed and they completely changed the driving dynamic of my 80. No more squirrelliness on the highway at all. Also recently installed the panhard bracket. Couldn't be happier. Thanks guys!
I have only heard from two people who have developed driveline vibes after installing our arms. Certainly doesn't mean more people haven't experienced them, it just seems to be the exception rather than the rule.Can folks with the arms installed share:
- which arms and lift? 2, 4, 6”?
- did you have driveshaft vibrations requiring a CV front driveshaft.
I’ve had several 80s w various lifts. One required a CV driveshaft. Hoping to understand the effect these arms have had on the front driveshaft.
Can folks with the arms installed share:
- which arms and lift? 2, 4, 6”?
- did you have driveshaft vibrations requiring a CV front driveshaft.
I’ve had several 80s w various lifts. One required a CV driveshaft. Hoping to understand the effect these arms have had on the front driveshaft.
When you say "I needed a dc front shaft..." does that mean you didn't have to get one and went with the 4" arms AND this remedied the problem?I have 4" arms with a Dobinson's 3" kit. The lift put me approximately 24" from hub center to fender in front. I needed a dc front shaft as my pinion was way off. I had a 5 degree difference between my pinion angle and my t cases angle. My pinion and driveshaft are between 1 and 2 degrees apart.