I think you really need to have a core that is capable of a certain amount of heat transfer, Hence the more core area and tighter fins per inch. A smaller area core no matter how much air you throw at it will only transfer so much heat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Has anyone tried going the other direction? By this I mean, instead of huge 27 core radiators with as big a fan will still fit after the fact, going with a thinner, high flow single core radiator and more fan... maybe even a fan shroud with it? LOL
I think you really need to have a core that is capable of a certain amount of heat transfer, Hence the more core area and tighter fins per inch. A smaller area core no matter how much air you throw at it will only transfer so much heat.
I have read that I remember Ole billa Vista from years ago on pirate. But my point was this. Any way you cut it if your core can not physically transfer the amount of BTU needed for the amount of horsepower/heat you develop you can never properly cool a engine.That's part of the reason why I went from a 3" thick 3 core to a 2.5" thick 2 core radiator, though the new radiator does have more surface area than the old one which is a step up anyway (294 sq in on the Griffin vs. 370 sq in on the new Champion). The slightly thinner radiator allowed me to fit a fan which covers more real estate, so more of the coolant flowing through the radiator is cooled by the fan.
Kinda. On a very simple level, it's a balancing act between radiator and fan. Tiny radiator and huge fan will be just as bad as a huge radiator with a tiny fan.
There's a lot of bad info out there when it comes to radiators and cooling.
If you have some time, this is a good read and fairly accurate:
Billa Vista Cooling Bible