I can think of no possible benefit or application where running negative caster would be of benefit or offer any advantages. Steering geometry is steering geometry. Caster, camber and toe would not vary if a vehicle were SUA, SOA, IFS, SR or whatever.
Please reference this source of info recommending negative caster.
X2 and it would cause dangerously unstable handling at anything above a snail's pace. Think about a grocery cart when the front wheels get turned around backwards.
I never said that it was recommended now, but that it was used with vehicles with no power steering, think about the early muscle cars, big heavy motor up front, no power steering. This is why these vehicles went straight really well, but aren't so good turning. The negative caster makes it so that there is a couple created with the rolling resistance and the force on the knuckle bearings/kingpin/etc. that causes the vehicle to wander more, but makes the steering very light, but with negative caster the tires do not recenter themselves.
I disagree with what you are saying dgangle, I believe that caster angles, camber, and toe will be different depending on the type of suspension since the path that the suspension takes is different for each one of those, hence having different handling characteristics. Type of tire makes a difference here as well, since bias tires are softer and tend to have a longer pneumatic tail (the contact location while moving is rear of the contact location still). Wheel backspacing, and tire width will come into effect too since when you move the centerline of the wheel/tire farther away from the knuckle you will have a larger scrub angle, which will cause the truck to wander more.
Everyone seems to have their own opinions on what caster should be set at, and this changes depending on their setup. I'm not saying at all that I believe that having a negative caster is the way to go, as I don't believe it is. It did exist, probably not anymore, and until radial tires and power steering it seemed to be used rather frequently.
oh, and sorry for the hijack!