- Thread starter
- #21
Why labor so much for so little to gain?
A part of the gain, James, is doing this before parts go the way of the dodo, that factoring in at ten times the importance level of any performance gain.
That, and the exhaust manifold leak (possibly intake. I can't tell), header issues (can feel it. Can't find it) carb plumbing, be it heat riser or vacuum lines incorrectly routed.
Drivetrain is coming out to seal the TC and tranny, so my thinking was, why not do it all, ensuring another 37 years of operation, while I can get the parts to do it?
As far as perceived performance gains, they're secondary in a butt dyno way.
The later head is stated by the gurus to be superior in design. It's not available "new", so will have to be rebuilt anyway.
Later pistons and rods are stated "improved", well the rods are, pistons have to swap regardless, in this plan.
The manifolds afford minor benefits, (I'm being honest here. I know they're roll is marginal in the scheme of things) in the two piece exhaust manifold design minimizing warpage, plus the two piece does allow for a freer flowing exhaust (which all has to be redone, anyway. Another factor).
I tried to find an OE carb, considering the 3F carbs weren't ever a smogged item and would've adapted to a de-smogged, recurved dizzy, to no avail, but Marshall had a 3F knockoff.
So, have manifolds for a later head, later head is stated superior, already need exhaust, dizzy/ignition, why not go all the way?
That was my thinking, but after it being stated by the carb man in and FI world that the most critical time in a rebuilt F series is the first 30 seconds after starting up, post rebuild, I'm concerned if I can even pull it off.


