Todays fill up was only 8km/l, this involved climbing an 1800m vertical hill for mountainbiking purposes and a lot of testing to see if I really did have 24psi max boost. Also I think it was last filled by the wife so may not have been completely full. The longest stretch of highway driving in this tank was about 30km. This is the worst fuel economy gets for me without towing something heavy.
so 8km per liter is 22.5 mpg uk right? so 18.7 us
I have never gotten under 18mpg us and thats the worse I think I have heard a 3B running. Mine is natural aspirated fuel cranked up I will hold 55mph up our steepest hills. Running our mountains or long freeways pinning the B out is where I get 18mpg us or 22.6uk :edit 21.6 uk
You are comparing a 5.2 liter diesel running 24psi in a vehicle with a unknown weight? I asked what vehicle. To a 3B na with cranked fuel, posting the worst numbers I have heard of for mileage and you are saying yours is SO much better mileage you don't even need to think of burning free oil, and all because its a DI? so vehicle weight don't matter and the fact you run 24psi of boost. btw 24 mpg uk to 30 mpg uk is not a HUGE difference. I bet if I drove like you I would easily get 26 mpg uk.
Anyways lets play that way since nothing else plays a roll.
My wife's om617 gets 25-30 mpg us thats 30-36 mpg uk And guess what, Its a IDI
Just saying guys we have to have all the facts. Do IDI engines if they where the exact same engine have better mileage? sure are they better? thats up to the individual user. Do they get such better mileage you would never have to DREAM of running WVO? psh yeah right.
I think Dougal just likes to argue, I see it a lot on here. The rest of us seem to actually give pros and cons to each and what we like about them and actual good info to the users. I like seeing the torque curves of each ect because I don't own a 13bt. Thats stuff I want to learn.
Not comparing a 4hk1 to the two engines the OP asked about.
ok I'm done, knowing it won't stop here


