Toyota Frame Class Action Suit (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Threads
7
Messages
189
Location
Phoenix, AZ
For Information Only - Does not seem to apply to Land Cruisers. But I wonder if it's only a matter of time because the 200-series isn't quite old enough yet? It covers the frames on 2008 Tundras but not 2008 Land Cruisers....could that be because the LC is made in Japan unlike the Tundra?



Nationwide Class to be Notified about Settlement to Inspect and Replace Up to 1.5 Million Frames on certain Toyota Tacoma, Tundra and Sequoia Vehicles


SAN DIEGO, Jan. 3, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- On Tuesday, January 3, 2017, notice will start being sent to consumers about a settlement reached between Toyota Motor Sales and the owners of Toyota Tacoma vehicles, model years 2005 to 2010; Toyota Tundra vehicles, model years 2007 to 2008; and Toyota Sequoia vehicles, model years 2005 to2008. The notice is sent pursuant to the December 2, 2016, order from the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granting preliminary approval of a settlement. The Court also appointed Timothy G. Blood of Blood Hurst & O'Reardon, LLP and Ben Barnow of Barnow and Associates, P.C. as Class Counsel.

The settlement involves about 1.5 million vehicles and covers all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the other United States territories and possessions.

Under the settlement, each class member is entitled to have their vehicle's frame inspected for rust corrosion. If excessive corrosion is found, the frame and associated parts will be replaced. The inspection and frame replacement is at no cost to class members.

A class member may have their vehicle's frame inspected for free for up to 12 years from the time the vehicle was first sold or leased, or one year from final settlement approval, whichever is longer. Class members also may have their frames inspected multiple times during this period.

"The frame plays a central role in the crashworthiness and stability of the vehicle. Inspections will cost the class member nothing and are important to ensure the vehicle's safety and structural integrity," said Timothy Blood of Blood Hurst & O'Reardon.

"Tim and I are very pleased to deliver this proposed remedy for consumers for the Court's review and, ultimately, for the benefit of every class member. Authorized Toyota dealerships will be available to provide inspections and required repairs. This is important to ensure the proper and prompt delivery of the settlement benefits to consumers," said Ben Barnow of Barnow and Associates.

The lawsuit is entitled Warner v. Toyota Motor Company, Case No. CV 15-2171 (C.D. Cal.). The final approval hearing is scheduled for April 27, 2017. For more information, visit: http://www.bholaw.com or http://www.barnowlaw.com
 
I think that's apples to oranges - A U.S. made Tundra had problems, does not relate to a Japan made Land Cruiser.

HTH
 
Maybe.. maybe not. I guess it depends if the failure is due to QC issues at the US plant or if the US plant was following proper procedures but Toyota's protection process was flawed/inadequate. Given the amount of rust seen on some LCs it definitely makes one wonder.
 
Last edited:
Dana. The domestic frame vendor.

'nuf said.
 
Maybe.. maybe not. I guess it depends if the failure is due to QC issues at the US plant or if the US plant was following proper procedures but Toyota's protection process wasn't flawed/inadequate. Given the amount of rust seen on some LCs it definitely makes one wonder.


For what it is worth I have never seen a Cruiser frame rot as quickly and severely as the Dana frames do.

Of course that does not mean that they did not get what they asked for.

I never saw a nasty frame in New Mexico. I have ben back in Utah for 9 months and I have seen multiple rotten, I mean really rotten, Dana frames.
 
If the LC isn't included I guess it could be for a variety of reasons...

1. Different frame or rust-proofing process used on it than the Tacoma, Sequoia, Tundra
2. Different/better quality control at the Japanese plants
3. Not enough "cases" of rust being an issue or brought to Toyota's attention simply because so many fewer LC's are on the road

Only #3 would be a concern as a LC owner.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom