- Thread starter
- #21
It is a $0 deductible Platinum PlanWas the $2995 for a -0- deductible Platinum plan or is there a deductible?
THX
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
It is a $0 deductible Platinum PlanWas the $2995 for a -0- deductible Platinum plan or is there a deductible?
THX
Will check it out. Thank you!That 8yr/75k warranty can be had for $1175 from Troy Dietrich
I picked up a ‘13 with ~14k miles and was sold a 4yr 50k mile $50 deductible EG Assurance warranty. Anyone have experience with this warranty? I’m thinking about cancelling as well.
You just bought a 7 year old LC and it only has 14k miles? What a find. Congratulations. Get your money back on the warrantyI picked up a ‘13 with ~14k miles and was sold a 4yr 50k mile $50 deductible EG Assurance warranty. Anyone have experience with this warranty? I’m thinking about cancelling as well.
Anyone?
This topic resurfaces often on here. I hate to rant, so please move on if you're not in the mood for it.
I think it's awesome people (like the OP) ask questions like this. Also awesome to get two/three view points for each person to come to their own conclusion. What I find irritating is that some state their opinion as fact when it is clearly an opinion. With that said, it is my opinion, that vehicle service contracts (VSCs) in general are not a rip off. Of course there is a chance that you will never use it (50%). There is also a chance that you will (50%). So that leads to the question of:
A) what is the value of peace of mind
B) what is the chance that your claim(s) over the term will exceed the cost? (or) cost of repair(s) + peace of mind.
Again; In my opinion, it is extremely unfair to tell someone adding protection is a "rip off" UNLESS you are willing to pay their repair bill. As a dealer who writes over 50,000 service RO's per year, I can show you (each & every day) countless situations where VSCs pay for themselves in just one use. Toyota's are great vehicles (in my opinion). But knowing that any repair, large or small, is covered 100% with no deductible has to have monetary value, especially if you are frugal with money.
Dealers have their profit margins (as does every product or service in every industry), I see no issues with that business model, it's called capitalism. I would never apologize (or ask someone to apologize) for making a profit. If a customer and dealer want to negotiate a "better" price then so be it. A good deal is when value exceeds price. Profit margin has absolutely nothing to to with a good deal.
If you don't like unexpected expenses, large or small, then you need to determine the value for yourself and whether it's a "good deal" for you.
Bought used 2016 14.4k miles in 2018, got 100k 8 year extended warranty. Hope I never have to use it but peace of mind. If I had bought new might not have done it. When got wife Infiniti G37S Coupe in 2009 new we got 100K 8 year extended and leaking timing chain cover paid back warranty cost 7 years later. So you just never know.
I agree with A and B completely, Eric, but I disagree with the capitalism part.
A) As far as peace of mind, I bought a Platnium VSA when I bought my CPO 2013 with 49k miles on it. We were financing for 5 years a vehicle which had 25 months of use already, and I preferred to pay $20/month for 5 years as an insurance policy against an expensive repair which the CPO warranty wouldn't cover. I think many folks who purchase the warranty are doing so for similar reasons
B) Whatever you pay for the warranty, statistically speaking the odds are it's a negative investment for you. The warranty is an insurance policy, and the warranty companies have actuarial tables in which they've calculated what the breakeven cost is, on average. That's ok though because for every person who drops $1300 on a policy that they don't use there are folks who avoid a $8k repair to replace the rear DVD player or some other expensive problem which wouldn't otherwise be covered.
In general the rule of thumb with extended warranties is that people should self-insure against small losses but externally insure against large or catastrophic ones. (So insure your house, don't buy an extended warranty on that new TV, and when it comes to your new (or new-ish) LC/LX everyone makes the call differently as to how much of a loss they are willing to absorb).
Now where I object is the capitalism comment, so feel free to stop reading here if you'd like.
I think a lot of people go into dealerships armed with invoice, other dealer, etc pricing, but there's far less transparency and information around what extended warranties, paint protection, tire protection cost, what financing/interest rates are available to the buyer (which are sometimes different than what people are quoted), etc. That's not to say that cost = value. I agree with you that profit margin doesn't imply a good or bad deal - but there are a lot of dealerships which take advantage of that information imbalance when people get into the finance office. (Note: I'm not implying your dealership does as I've never been there, but my father-in-law worked in the finance group for several dealerships in the Baltimore/DC area and he was a real sleazebag).
There is a line somewhere where legitimate capitalism (i.e. Apple's profit margins on a product they created) crosses over into price gouging (i.e. 10x overcharging because someone stockpiled hand sanitizer and N95 masks and created a shortage). An extended warranty isn't the same need as PPE, but when someone else is paying 2.5x what I just paid for the exact same thing because there's very little if any transparency in either the cost or expected value, at the very least it's just plain taking advantage of someone. Capitalism is about supply and demand, and markets are about fair price discovery. Fair price doesn't mean at cost, but it does mean being able to factor in cost, profit margin, statistical likelihood of failures, average repair cost, etc. Toyota's policy change a few years back which prevents (highly discourages? penalizes?) dealers from selling VSAs to people who aren't in the same state and/or who don't go into the dealership they are buying it from seems to encourage the bad dealer behaviors and discourage transparency with customers.
FWIW while I'm probably a bit too price sensitive at times, I would've still purchased my VSA if the price was in the $1500-1600 range, which by my "back of the napkin" calculation would have been a fair price. But when the dealer started at $3000 and then kept negotiating down again and again to get my sale I went from "what's fair" to "I am going to win this negotiation", which ultimately became a $1200 purchase. So they could've made more profit on me if they had been reasonable from the start. And while I'm sure the finance department still made money on it (because they wouldn't have sold it if they didn't); however I have to ask (rhetorically):
a. How many $3,000 warranties do the dealerships really sell that if you just set a fixed price with a reasonable profit margin you wouldn't make up for it?,
and
b. What's the "value" to dealerships of making the buying experience miserable for consumers? (Or conversely, what would the value be to your dealership if it made the *entire* buying experience pleasant and low-hassle?)
I'll leave you with a thought around point (b) above. Those who know me well would agree I'm too "price sensitive" too often (read: I'm a cheap bastard). When I purchased my 2013 I ended up with gold because it was $5k cheaper than red, black, or gray. (Red would've been my preferred color). I had it shipped from Houston to Chicago because even with shipping it was still $4500 less. However I did NOT try to negotiate the price with the Chicago dealer - in part because the Houston dealer already had the lowest price for a similar LC in the entire country, but also because the Chicago dealer was willing to handle the vehicle transport logistics for me, and I felt that whatever profit they were getting on the sale (despite me having done all the work to locate the vehicle I wanted) was entirely "fair".