This is what I was kind thing or maybe a 1st gen Sequoia?A 3rd gen 4runner rear window might be cool. They are power roll up and plentiful used. Although if you have a box back their it might not be very useful to you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
This is what I was kind thing or maybe a 1st gen Sequoia?A 3rd gen 4runner rear window might be cool. They are power roll up and plentiful used. Although if you have a box back their it might not be very useful to you.
Any progress?
Came across this... A little different than what you're doing, but still, you don't see too many FJ60's with the roof chopped!
It would be cool to get a couple of shots of that 2.8 40 too!
Any thoughts yet on your motor mount for the 2uz on the 80 frame? I am currently looking for ideas....
Do I have your attention.... I call it VERA.
Any updates? Love the work you've done thus far.
I have one comment...
Patagonia is a bucket-list item for me. No Question. To drive it would be a dream.It's not so much about capability of the hardware, more about the robustness of the design/development work done. What huge faults are you seeing in Toyota production vehicles? Every one I've drive has been pretty darn bulletproof from a calibration standpoint.
Sure, a standalone system has a lot of knobs to turn and that can be advantageous depending on your goals. Yes, you can tune based on IAT and MAP, but did you actually test it at all conditions or just extrapolate the map out and hope for the best? In essence I'm asking the small tuner shop if you have the time (or if your customer will pay for it) to turn each knob and optimize the system for all possible conditions? I do believe that any OEM calibration is a significantly more robust system than what an aftermarket/performance/tuner shop can produce in terms of reliability and driveability across a wide range of conditions. That's the bias I was referring to. For a racecar with a limited operating envelope I'd be running a standalone, but that's not what I'm building. Even street cars with fairly standard usage in a known environment can perform quite well with custom tunes, but we're talking about off-road, out-of-country overland vehicles here. It's a different demographic.
Custom tuning, standalone systems, etc is certainly a viable business model as has been proven by many shops. It makes sense when you're talking about performance builds because the factory systems do leave things on the table in the name of durability and conservative tuning for tails cases (ex: Joe Blow puts the s***ty 85 octane gas in Colorado in his turbocharged DI engine). This isn't a high performance build though, and the overland community doesn't seem to desire the last 5% of performance at the expense of reliability. The purpose of these vehicles is to take you across landscapes, altitudes, locations, and seasons without a hitch. Sacrificing some peak performance is a reasonable tradeoff for robustness to varying conditions.
My goal for this one is to drive it to Patagonia. That means huge changes in weather, altitude, and fuel quality. I want seamless operation in all environments (at the expense of peak power) so I'm relying on Toyota and their development process because it's far more thorough than what I can complete on my own. If I (or my customers) just wanted peak HP I'd just put an LS in it (and probably still use a GMPP computer).