Phx99Cruiser said:So what's the difference between the OME 866 and 863? On the Slee site they're both listed under the Heavy Load Kits.
I would just plan on using the N101/N133 shocks (whichever is the rear #) so I shouldn't have the unseating problem with the 866 spring, right?
I plan no immediate or near-term mods like a rear or front bumper, just will occasionally load the LC up with camping gear, etc.
So far I've been thinking I'd go with the 865 Medium load with the heavy load shocks...
#1 the 866 is a "progressive rate spring"...and forgetting about the paper specs for the spring rates for these two springs...in actual use (I have used both plus the 865) the 863 is stiffer and taller. The problem I had with the 866 is the softer coil section (part of the "progressive design") would totally collapse and then you are left with an effectively shorter spring to do all the work: I didn't like the 866 at all. Although there are others here that like the 866. You are correct in as much as I know...whith the N101 there is no need to anchor the springs (although it wouldn't hurt to do it either). If you are not going to add rear bumper/drawers/or alot of extra weight in the back I would recommend the 865's. And the 863's on my rig are not perfect either...ideally for my rig I need a slightly stiffer spring...but Christo (SleeOffroad) is working on that fix!
One last thing: If you use the 'Search' feature you will find all kinds of information regarding these springs.
Oh yea...welcome to 'MUD
