Pura Vida
What an absolute noob
If you buy a defender, make sure to get 2 so that you have something to drive while the other one is in the shop
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
As for the new Defender, I, too, was disappointed. I loved the 2014 LR4 that I had (though it did have the disappearing shift knob). 2 years. 50K+ miles. Some great adventures. It was my first vehicle that could go offroad (though I did not do aggressive stuff like some of you). I loved that you could make the cargo floor flat. Plenty of great memories. (see pics below). So I was hoping that the new Defender would be robust enough to be my next vehicle after my 2016 LC finally died.
At the failure rate we are seeing you might need 3 to be really sure.If you buy a defender, make sure to get 2 so that you have something to drive while the other one is in the shop
Thanks for posting - those are the differences I was referring to.
The LX is returning to the USA, and because the GX is basically a prado since the beginning, It would be pretty safe to say the LX will be a rebodied 300 with new springs, although you may need to do some work on the face to get better angles, and pay a little extra $$$ for the Lexus badge, but nonetheless a land cruiser. I would go for the armada just because it is so much more reasonable, and a lot of the issues with the diff and etc can be fixed with some time. Some LX models can go up to 100k ver easily, while the armada starts at 50k and can go up to 70k in options. Both are very nice vehicles.
If you buy a defender, make sure to get 2 so that you have something to drive while the other one is in the shop
The problem I see is that you have a company built around a quality management system building a SUV (Toyota) versus a SUV company tying to reverse engineer quality (Land Rover). That doesn't work. Never has.
Quality is a culture, and is starts from day one, and is instilled in every choice, every employee, every process, every decision. The cost of quality is exponentially more the further you get from the origin, and at some point it becomes uneconomical. Land Rover will never be able to reverse engineer in Toyota quality in an economically viable way.
I wish Land Rover well too. I like the new Defender conceptually. I LOVE the original D90 styling. It screams rugged capability. Unfortunately, unless I win a lottery and get to build out a stable with many vehicles, I'll never own one. And if I did, I'd want one that had been worked over, like a Bowler.
<fantasy time> What would be freaking awesome is for Toyota to take design cues from Land Rover and build a more offroad focused SUV with a rugged looking exterior. While my Land Cruiser checks a ton of boxes for me, and I can't think of any better vehicle that meets my criteria, the exterior styling is pretty "meh". They could do better (and the 300 is not it).
I really think this hit the nail on the head. Buying JLR and RR is a emotional-driven decision and this is entirely marketing driven along with the upscale image that RR has towards royalty and the wealthy elite. The budget for marketing for RR and the Defender is far far higher than that with the Land Cruiser. I find this is the same case with the Ford F-150 and the gaudy marketing that is done day in day out. 99% of people take these commercials and extremely biased reviews (even independent reviewers, as they won't actually speak bad about the product so they keep getting test vehicles and product launch invites), and the population can't distinguish that its actually a poor product long-term. Land Rovers sell like hotcakes in the north east because of the image it presents (wealthy estate Barbour and Wellington wearing white aristocrat). If everyone bought cars based on logic and not emotion, everyone would all be driving Toyotas, Hondas, and Kia/Hyundais.I venture to say 90% of car buyers in North America do so based on the emotional and manipulative advertisements. There's more than enough data on Consumer Reports and online forums clearly showing the horrible quality and durability of Land Rover, most anything by "Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep", Fiat, etc. They get a Jeep cuz they see a tv ad with a group of millennials driving around on EASY sand having fun. Most of the tv ads of Jeeps or Rovers or whatever plowing through snow? If you look closely, it's a flat road, very powdery snow, and untouched (snowy roads with light traffic tends to create icy spots).
Sales people know it's always about the buyer's emotions. Once the sales person knows it and can maximize it, then the deal is done. I love Subaru's but find their tv ads about dogs driving Outbacks to be annoying. Clearly, there's a whole bunch of buyers who care nothing of the quality and durability of a Subaru but are easily sold by seeing dogs on tv.
I really think this hit the nail on the head. Buying JLR and RR is a emotional-driven decision and this is entirely marketing driven along with the upscale image that RR has towards royalty and the wealthy elite. The budget for marketing for RR and the Defender is far far higher than that with the Land Cruiser. I find this is the same case with the Ford F-150 and the gaudy marketing that is done day in day out. 99% of people take these commercials and extremely biased reviews (even independent reviewers, as they won't actually speak bad about the product so they keep getting test vehicles and product launch invites), and the population can't distinguish that its actually a poor product long-term. Land Rovers sell like hotcakes in the north east because of the image it presents (wealthy estate Barbour and Wellington wearing white aristocrat).
Hell, Land Cruisers sell themselves. They sell them through the countries national Toyota distributor by the tens of thousands every year overseas and also fleet sales. Toyota LCs testament towards durability and quality is the marketing that it does to sell itself. And to some, and many other here on Mud, the great logic behind them ends up becoming the emotional-driven decision to get these.
Will I be picking up a Defender? Yes, I will be when they're 50-60%+ depreciated very soon. I will certainly rag on it too. Sure they aren't reliable but I actually want to wrench and work on them. I nerd out over design and engineering so my curiosity in the Defender is high with what is it made of. First thing I'm going to pick up is the GAP diagnostic tool for Land Rovers. My only exposure into Land Rover is when a very good friend lent me their 2016 Range Rover Sport that was their Tahoe ski-house vehicle for a week when I was there. It felt bland and emotion-less personally to me. Anyways, I'm excited to pick up a used Defender so I can make the decision personally if these are actually POS or if they're worth at least some of their weight. I'm more excited to be taking failed parts off and seeing how they failed, including the complex computer system they've got.
No! The 2016 was doing great. But it is such a great vehicle for me I wanted to extend the period of time that I can drive a Land Cruiser. The 2021 I now have is almost identical to the 2016 I had along with the HE refinements. And it was essentially the last, new LC in Central Oregon. Nothing more than resetting the clock/miles.I’m curious did your 2016 LC actually die? 5 years seems a little soon no?
If I was just going to be commuting in safe neighborhoods always in cell range with a tow truck readily available, and a readily available backup vehicle, I could see how living with a vehicle with questionable reliability might be tolerable. Might. Inconvenience factor aside. Maybe. But to have a vehicle on the trail where you very well could be breaking down in the middle of nowhere, there is a strong likelihood of poor to no cell service, you are likely inconveniencing others you are driving with, and getting out safely is a non-trivial matter. No thank you. Hard pass.That’s a fascinating hobby for sure. Buying stuff that breaks a lot so you can figure out their mistakes.
.....and that “Jeep wave” thing.I venture to say 90% of car buyers in North America do so based on the emotional and manipulative advertisements. There's more than enough data on Consumer Reports and online forums clearly showing the horrible quality and durability of Land Rover, most anything by "Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep", Fiat, etc. They get a Jeep cuz they see a tv ad with a group of millennials driving around on EASY sand having fun. Most of the tv ads of Jeeps or Rovers or whatever plowing through snow? If you look closely, it's a flat road, very powdery snow, and untouched (snowy roads with light traffic tends to create icy spots).
Sales people know it's always about the buyer's emotions. Once the sales person knows it and can maximize it, then the deal is done. I love Subaru's but find their tv ads about dogs driving Outbacks to be annoying. Clearly, there's a whole bunch of buyers who care nothing of the quality and durability of a Subaru but are easily sold by seeing dogs on tv.
What biased car reviews?
The irony is all of these issues where already known before they started selling to the public. The gave them to RR enthusiasts for review and they all came back saying WTF?! It's broke already. I used to be a fan boi or RR but I switched to LC. Tired of all the issues and breakdowns. It looks like it's only getting worse. They do not market them any more for folks that take them off road. They market them to people that want to look like they go off road and have a perfect manicured beard and want the luxury to go with an image. Nothing wrong with that it's marketing for a sale. Every company does it. Aftermarket parts companies won't even go near them. Liability. They are nothing more than a super model, male or female. Great looking but that's it. Don't attempt a conversation. I don't feel bad for the company. Who owns them now anyway. They sell the brand every 5 years so it's not like it's the original owners? Dig your own grave. It's only a matter of time till people stop buying them because they are so unreliable. If they break down 2x in the first year or more how do you justify that to the consumer? If I bought a lawnmower that broke down at this rate I would get rid of it and never buy that brand again warranty be damned. And that's my rant.
Your screen name is perfect given that background!I am going to provide my .02 even though it wasn't requested.... I had a new defender that was lemon lawed and after months of issues it was finally bought back by JLR. The Defenders are nice to drive and capable cars but I would wait another two years before pulling the trigger as there are many teething problems. I had 17 miles on the clock and electrical gremlins were rampant-- even worse the dealer stated "its a land rover they are not perfect"
Also I am now in a 200 series cruiser....