At my last inspection (30k mi on 2004 LC), I was notified that my rear pads were getting low and that I should soon get new pads and turn the rotors. That was a couple of months ago. I've now got a squeak while driving so I think its probably time to do the brakes.
My question is whether I should just get new pads ($110, at the dealer) or whether I should also have the rotors turned ($289) (of course, dealer will recommend turning).
I've heard that turning the rotors is often a waste and can lead to warped rotors soon after. Thus, I'm inclined to just do the pads and put new rotors on next time I need brakes. That said, if it's a safety issue or if I won't lose the squeak without turning the rotors, I'll turn them.
What are the downsides to not turning rotors? If it's just shorter pad life, then, unless it cuts the pad life in half, it seems like I ought not turn.
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
My question is whether I should just get new pads ($110, at the dealer) or whether I should also have the rotors turned ($289) (of course, dealer will recommend turning).
I've heard that turning the rotors is often a waste and can lead to warped rotors soon after. Thus, I'm inclined to just do the pads and put new rotors on next time I need brakes. That said, if it's a safety issue or if I won't lose the squeak without turning the rotors, I'll turn them.
What are the downsides to not turning rotors? If it's just shorter pad life, then, unless it cuts the pad life in half, it seems like I ought not turn.
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.