Tell me why anyone would want a BOV for any application, because I'm mystified what it's use is if it does not limit boost.
As I seem to have to keep saying, the BOV is much faster reacting than a WG. It will respond to exceeding the desired boost limit much faster than the WG can. Ultimate boost control is the job of the WG. Immediate boost control is the job for the the BOV.
I've said this before, but it doesn't seem to be making a dent so I'll try one last time; with the BOV set slightly below the WG's limit the BOV will pop open when the throttle is slammed closed from a WOT or nearly so condition during a shift. That vents boost to somewhere other than up against the closed throttle plate, which keeps the compressed air column from acting as a brake against the compressor wheel and causing the shaft to slow down. Because this is a high speed transitory condition the WG will not respond fast enough to start limiting boost. This keeps the turbo shaft spinning near it's max speed or at least in it's map so that when the throttle is opened again the BOV will close and you'll have an already spooled up turbo making boost in the next gear.
Of course, my employment developing
this turbo probably means that I don't know anything at all about turbos. I know that there is a lot about matching turbos to applications that I don't know, but how a turbo works and what it wants to do it's job, and even how to destroy them intentionally is something that I've been immersed in for the last 3-4 years.
Turbos don't wear out from excessive speed, they blow up from excessive speed. Turbo's wear from cold starts-ups,
hot shut-downs, and from hours in service. IF the bearings & seals used are quality parts and of the correct specs then it should be many, many, many hours in service. A shorter turbo life span is the fault of the support system(s), not the turbo.
Turbulence, in the right place, is the best possible condition for engine performance and economy. Look up "tumble ports".