Appears not. Spray pattern on hood mat and surrounds near the resevoir. underside was caked with snow/ice/mud which they sprayed off looking for leaks elsewhere. dealer refilled and drove around a bit but found no leaks. New pump and fluid and all is right for now.
To side with you, and to be a little frustrated with the mechanic: there is no way on earth that a component on a truck can fail, by deflecting/destroying a bearing and not also break the seal. UGH!
I’ve broken Toyota IFS racks, the rack gear, in half. Boiled the fluid from crawling, bent rods. Heck, we’ve blown two tundra racks on our 3rd gen Tacoma with 37s that just gets pounded off road. Never have I even heard of a situation when pressure built, and blew out the resi cap. Combined with that, there is no fluid leaking from the damaged rack. I’d go into that dealership, raise hell and be ready to talk about the Magnuson Moss Act.
This is like when I had a pinion seal leak on a rear diff (other Truck, had 8,000 miles on it) . A Toyota tried to tell me because of my lift, that it damaged the seal. “Ok, is the bearing damaged?” I asked “No,” the service guys said. “Then how the F does the seal deflect enough to fail, but the bearing is still keeping things within .001” and hasn’t blown up the rear end?” Humm, kinda hard to figure that one out. That’s when they replaced it under warranty.
That whole “tie rod flip kit” @bloc. The outer tie rod is mounted to the bottom of the spindle. So in theory, you could mount it to the top of the spindle by making an adapter that would change the taper of the mating surfaces. It’s not a bad idea in general, but it is also not necessary at all for our trucks.
This rack, in my opinion, is fine, and whatever failed, was going to fail, regardless of any modification. And that is common. We know of quite a few odd ball things that have failed on new 200s.