That's some lucky luck.Happen to come across this set of used 18s.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
That's some lucky luck.Happen to come across this set of used 18s.
I zoomed in on a picture from eBay and it has this rating: VIA T-965KG (maybe 955KG) and P-770KG. From a quick googling, it seems like the ratings depend on type of vehicle the wheel is fitted to (possibly 2 wheel per axle or 4 wheel per axle?). It is also rated with the JWL-T which means it met some light truck standard. In rays ads they also suggest that they test beyond the JWL standards.
On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Rays is considered pretty cutting edge for wheel manufacturers and this wheel was made specifically for the LC/LX, so I can't imagine it not being fit for the job. Possibly you could argue that it wasn't built to go off road I suppose.
Good find. I ran into this issue when I was originally shopping for wheels. It seems the JWL and VIA have standard "general use" load limits defined based only on lug and hub measurements but they don't define the safe carrying capacity of a specific wheel. More importantly, it seems like they leave safe max load designations up to the manufacturers. In so many cases, the manufacturers do not provide that.
Obviously having the JWL-T and VIA stamps are great, but if you take it at face value, 955KG is still way too low for a LC/LX, especially mine
No chance I would do my normal wheeling at > 8000lbs on 18 lb wheels with a 2100 lb rating on each corner.
I think the Volks are pretty popular in UAE and Japan. I’ve never seen a failure posted up that I can recall.
Just chiming in to say that as mentioned earlier, they are stamped 770 kg. JWL standards are always getting updated which was probably why these OG TEs were discontinued (also the reason why production of the popular TE37Xs were stopped with the new TE37XTs taking its place).
That is some serious off camera light there....
Hopefully the 770 KG is VIA P and somewhere on yours there is also VIA T-955KG.
That is some serious off camera light there....
Hopefully the 770 KG is VIA P and somewhere on yours there is also VIA T-955KG.
I’ll have to take another look…
Taken with the long exposure setting on my iPhone 11 Pro.![]()
If you bang up a pretty aftermarket wheel, you'll have to go and spend big bucks for a replacement.
Is it possible Japan/Rays generally only "certifies" them up to the GVWR when they are fairly specifically made for only one vehicle? I downloaded an annual catalog and the only vehicles with the 5x150 patterns were the 100/200/70 series.
I don't want to belabor this discussion because this is probably not the best thread for it, but I think that the JWL and VIA ratings are solely based on the lug and hub configuration, and not to a specific application. So technically it may be specific to the LC, but not because they are designed for the LC GAWR (not GVWR), but because it is specific to the 5/150 pattern with a 110 hub. Any wheel made with 5/150/110 would have the same exact VIA rating.
At least that is how it was explained to me.
You could start a general thread discussion on the topicI’d still like to hear more. Anywhere else more appropriate to have this fleshed out? Kind of important to know.
I’d still like to hear more. Anywhere else more appropriate to have this fleshed out? Kind of important to know.
I agree that it is important. I am probably not the most knowledgeable person to discuss though. We could start a separate thread or bring it up in the tire/wheel sticky and see if we can get more SME input.
My limited knowledge comes from my many months of shopping for wheels, and I found it to be incredibly confusing and difficult to find accurate information. Most manufacturers websites are terrible and lack anything but marketing fluff. Vendors rarely provide the type of technical specs that are important, and some just seem to make stuff up.
The reason I went with ICON is because I was actually able to talk to one of their engineers at Overland Expo for a while and specifically about the LC. I would agree with eatSleepWoof that OEM is the safest option. The ICON Vectors exceed the max weight rating of any OEM option, but if I were a betting person, a rock warrior is likely to exceed the capability of the vector in any practical sense.
Do you know where the oem weight ratings can be found?