Just from a wheel standpoint, the 8400 lb limit that Vin shares, is still above both GVWR & GAWR of the LC? Depending on the year of course.
For your 2013 LC, vehicle weight is 5,730, so it would be limited to an additional 1,655 lbs of (passengers, bumpers, etc.). Is my thinking correct here?
JP
Frankly, no. Please consider what Toyota has determined what is a safe specification for Load Limit. We determine this by looking at the OEM tire size and recommended Cold Tire Inflation Pressure. This is a P285/60-18 tire inflated to 33psi F/R. Industry standards show us that this equals a 2,512 pound Load Limit for each wheel. Times 4, this is 10,048 pounds. When choosing other tire sizes, the recommended Cold Tire Inflation Pressure is calculated to result in AT LEAST the same Load Limit.
We cannot evaluate a safe Load Limit by directly comparing to GVWR or GAWR as you have. What we must consider is the design safety margin between the GVWR/GAWR and the tire/wheel Load Limit.
In the case of my 2013 LC, for example, the GVWR of 7,385 pounds is approximately 73.5% of the combined Load Limit of the wheels/tires of 10,048 pounds: 7385 / 10048 = 0.7349 * 100 = 73.49%. This indicates a designed in safety margin of approximately 26.51% GVWR:Tire/Wheel Load Limit (100% - 73.49% = 26.51% safety margin). With Vin's wheels, this safety margin shrinks to approximately 12.08% - less than half of the Toyota designed 26.51% safety margin (7385 / 8400 = 0.8792 * 100 = 87.92% then 100% - 87.92% = 12.08%). Purposely cutting the design safety margin by half seems an unsafe course of action.
The same applies to the Tire/Wheel Load Limit:GAWR ratio:
Rear axle GAWR is 4,300 pounds for the LC200. Designed Tire/Wheel Load Limit for one axle is 5,024 pounds (2,512 * 2 = 5,024). This yields a Tire/Wheel Load Limit:GAWR ratio of approximately 116.84% (5024 / 4300 = 1.1684 * 100 = 116.84% - 100% = 16.84%) which is a safety margin of approximately 16.84%. With Vin's wheels, however, this safety margin shrinks to -2.33% (4200 / 4300 = 0.9767 * 100 = 97.67% - 100% = -2.33%). This means worse than no safety margin at all! In fact, the design limit of Vin's wheels would be exceeded by 2.33% EVEN WHEN STATIC, i.e. no dynamic/live loading (this means moving, hitting potholes, turning, etc.) which should be covered by a safety margin which, in the case of Vin's wheels, does not exist. Not a wise choice.
The same calcs for the front axle with stock wheels/tires work out to (5024 / 3595 = 1.3975 * 100 = 139.75% - 100% = 39.75%) a safety margin of 39.75%. For Vin's wheels on the front axle (4200 / 3595 = 1.1683 * 100 = 116.83% - 100% = 16.83%) a safety margin of only 16.83% - less than half the design safety margin. Again, not a wise choice.
How about an easy summary of the data:
Parameter : OEM Design : Vin's Wheels
GVWR Safety Margin : 26.51% : 12.08%
GAWR (Rear) Safety Margin : 16.84% : -2.33%
GAWR (Front) Safety Margin : 39.75% : 16.83%
Respectfully, any wheel that has a Load Limit of only 2100 pounds, like Vin's wheels, is NOT a safe choice for use on the LC200.
HTH