OEM Starter Gear for early model 40 series starter. Excess to my needs. $30+postage, world wide.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
28011-60041
This was the second earliest one 1969/07-1972/03
There were an even earlier one #-60040 code but only for a few months 1969/03-1969/06.
3/69 is only the date Toyota has chose to support back to in the parts system. Toyota first imported a Land Cruiser to the US back in 1958. The starter used into the early sixties was different then the one used in 3/69.![]()
69 is not early sixties. 69 is 69 actually its almost 70. You can keep your anegdotes but the catalog is the only written proof of age genuinity. Surely not always accurate as anything in life.3/69 is only the date Toyota has chose to support back to in the parts system. Toyota first imported a Land Cruiser to the US back in 1958. The starter used into the early sixties was different then the one used in 3/69.![]()
Pleasure..Thanks for taking time and replying back. Much appericiated.
69 is not early sixties. 69 is 69 actually its almost 70. You can keep your anegdotes but the catalog is the only written proof of age genuinity. Surely not always accurate as anything in life.
Your comment is only confusing rather helpful. Take a look at how precise I describe my classified and you only wish every advertiser is as accurate to lead and not mislead buyers.
Who are you mad at and why?
Ok, doesnt matter.. gurus..
we talking about a part and its suitability for a vehicle.the only tangible evidence of that is the master catalog. Anything else is just an opinion. Surely one can argue and argue that the catalog is wrong and what those dates interpret.
The dates according to the manual refering to part introducrion dates. How?would toyota introduce a part. Just bring a starter gear clutch to market? No. Its part of the car. That was manufactured on the date, the date in the book recorded.
I like as we all to be accurate and like open talk and correction cos that brings value and funnels down to valid info.
Saying that "in those days this and that" doesnt help, these are numbers and dates crossreferwncing each other. Now if by chance some part sometimes at the rearest doesn't correspond 30-40years ago well we not those deviations for our record. A guru should bring that record if have such to share if no record of such than just keep the opinion to self.
Otherwise its action undermines the guru status. In my humble opinion.
Thank you.Not one word of that made any sense. LITP mearly mentioned that the electronic parts catalog only goes back to 3/1969, so this part may have a broader range of possible years it was used. Many of us on this forum have all of the 1960's parts manuals on paper and could easily confirm this.
Nobody is providing "opinions" on this subject. The fact that the electronic parts catalog only goes back to 3/1969 is a fact.