- Thread starter
- #41
Fill up report.
Before SC i was getting 11.1 MPG based on the computer. I didn't do the old fashion calculation. Should of but I was lazy.
After SC I am getting 11.5 MPG based on how much I filled up and the distance I drove. I drove normal and didn't do 0-60 pulls. I did do some slight spirited driving when getting on on-ramps (only part throttle). Trip computer says I'm doing 15.9mpg which is wrong due to the increased injector size.
Overall feel is low end torque is there, and getting up to speed isn't requiring more then a 1/4 throttle input versus half throttle. Intake noise is gone (I had the TRD intake box) and only a slight SC whine can be heard. The LC200 has been limited to baby carting duties so I haven't used it's full potential yet. Will be doing some long hauls in the summer and will see how it does then.
Is the cost of install worth it? fuel saving vs cost is not there. Power is there and if you are like Tim the toolman..."More Power"!!
Before SC i was getting 11.1 MPG based on the computer. I didn't do the old fashion calculation. Should of but I was lazy.
After SC I am getting 11.5 MPG based on how much I filled up and the distance I drove. I drove normal and didn't do 0-60 pulls. I did do some slight spirited driving when getting on on-ramps (only part throttle). Trip computer says I'm doing 15.9mpg which is wrong due to the increased injector size.
Overall feel is low end torque is there, and getting up to speed isn't requiring more then a 1/4 throttle input versus half throttle. Intake noise is gone (I had the TRD intake box) and only a slight SC whine can be heard. The LC200 has been limited to baby carting duties so I haven't used it's full potential yet. Will be doing some long hauls in the summer and will see how it does then.
Is the cost of install worth it? fuel saving vs cost is not there. Power is there and if you are like Tim the toolman..."More Power"!!