LX700h announcement (3 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

We went through this when the 250 was released too. Nobody has been able to clearly or reliably explain how the "Tire and Loading Information" is calculated, or why it's several hundred pounds different than the conventional way of calculating payload.

I recall that @cruiseroutfit did make an inquiry with several people who would know (thank you, again); those people reported, if I recall, that it involved a complicated and inconsistent mix of factors.

That leaves us (or me, at least) with the conventional (longstanding) payload calculation, which is as follows:

Payload = (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating) - (Curb Weight)

700h OT: 1,505 lbs
250 1958: 1,365 lbs
Ah, yes, I do remember that conversation now, thanks for the reminder. I'm with you on the simple payload calc. Makes a lot more sense.
 
We went through this when the 250 was released too. Nobody has been able to clearly or reliably explain how the "Tire and Loading Information" load rating is calculated, or why it's several hundred pounds different than the conventional way of calculating payload.

I recall that @cruiseroutfit did make an inquiry with several people who would know (thank you, again); those people reported, if I recall, that it involved a complicated and inconsistent mix of factors.

That leaves us (or me, at least) with the conventional (longstanding) payload calculation, which is as follows:

Payload = (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating) - (Curb Weight)

700h OT: 1,505 lbs
250 1958: 1,365 lbs

I believe tire selection and inflation pressures probably play into the "Tire and Loading Information" sticker.
 

The triple lock should be front and center. It is a BIG deal for Toyo trucks since the 80 series. The fuel tank is the downside but gets the same range of my 200 (although mine does not require premium). At least the engine bay is not a rat's nest. I just wish it had a Toyota badge and be called LC. Oh...and that nose kills the approach. :rolleyes:
 
The triple lock should be front and center. It is a BIG deal for Toyo trucks since the 80 series. The fuel tank is the downside but gets the same range of my 200 (although mine does not require premium). At least the engine bay is not a rat's nest. I just wish it had a Toyota badge and be called LC. Oh...and that nose kills the approach. :rolleyes:

Yes, it has front, center, and rear lockers.

I don't think the overhangs are going to be as huge a deal as people think. H2 gives the truck 3.3" of lift and equipping 34" tires will further improve the approach and departure angles.

It was the same type of commentary on the GX550 Overtrail. And yet after about 1000 miles of trail time I didn't scrap my bumpers once.

Black Bear and Poughkeepsie did require some careful tire placement, but I made it through unscathed.
 
Last edited:
Yes, it has front, center, and rear lockers.
Hahaha...I meant "front and center" as the BIG thing to showcase. Reading again, I can understand how one could think I was saying it should have front and center lockers. ;)

It was the same type of commentary on the GX550 Overtrail
The overhang on the GX seems to be a tad less than in the LX, no? I do not know the answer, it is just my perception from looking at both.
 
Slightly less up front yes, but then again the GX was fixed height.
 
To answer a question the payload is calculated by curb weight with full gas tank minus gvwr. If they add floormats and hitch shank etc etc at the port they get that secondary yellow sticker mentioned.

Pretty simple. Will do a 2 row to get back some.

Toyota could increase the gvwr some by increasing the tire inflation psi. Ford does this with their trucks up and down on the psi.
 
The overhang on the GX seems to be a tad less than in the LX, no? I do not know the answer, it is just my perception from looking at both.
By the time I will start considering a LX600 or 700 I assume and hope CBI or otherwise will have brought out a simple bumper to cut back on the huge hour glass and provide more clearance.
 
Really like the bumper, but called them and was told it may not be available till this summer :(
Good news is, once Slee products hit the market, they are well tested and "thoroughly cooked."

Summer will be here before we know it.

But what I really want is a set of AHC-compatible sliders and LX7 compatible skids!!



1738270127360.png


1738270147273.png


1738270183068.png
 
Couldn't agree more with this statement! I have Slee armor all around and it is amazing build quality - and extremely well thought out!!
Likewise!

I have their skids and sliders on the 200 and their air compressor mount too. I may have to pick up a short-bus or blueberry bumper for the 80 and 100!

Edit:
Like seriously, their skid system was shockingly easy to install and well thought out. No joke, I wrapped it up in 45minutes in my drive way.
 
This is good to see: GVWR is 3380kg or 7450#.

So if the curb weight is right at 6000# we're looking at a payload of 1,450!
They are doing GVM/GVWR upgrades in Australia of 3990kgs or ~8800 lbs with just a change of springs, shocks and tires.

They are also going 4200kgs (9260 lbs) GVWR upgrades with upgraded rear axle (3000kg)

jmacx-300-series-diff-housing-side-700x700-1.png


 
Good info, hopefully the manufacturer takes note. I think 1,650lbs ~750kg should be their goal without changing anything but tire psi.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom