Builds Katit's LX470 2001 restoration/maintenance thread

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

So #1 remains mystery because not shown in FSM

FSM require only one bottom clip. Installing two clips seems like a better anti-rattle solution. But the best solution is 47748-60030 from TLC80/Prado90/4Runner...
 

FSM require only one bottom clip. Installing two clips seems like a better anti-rattle solution. But the best solution is 47748-60030 from TLC80/Prado90/4Runner...
Do you have this page from FSM? Because my FSM doesn't show it, must be certain year change
 
Weekend was busy. Got pretty much all assembled, waiting for few bits from a dealer to finish.

Bearings preload: Had to go up to 80Nm to get 14lb of preload. I went with tighter setup since those are new bearings and will give in.
Snap rings - on both sides size D was a match. C wouldn't fit. Also, interesting it measured at 2.35-2.36 but those should be either 2.3 or 2.4 :)

Hopefully today will be "dial in" evening. All fluids, startup and getting height in order. Bleed AHC, brakes, power steering..

b3.webp


ring.webp


ring2.webp


b2.webp


b1.webp
 
if i put this much work into my cruiser, i'd keep it forever. Looking great my friend, i admire your work ethics and wish every cruiser have an owner like you, there are so many neglected ones out there that makes me sad.
 
if i put this much work into my cruiser, i'd keep it forever. Looking great my friend, i admire your work ethics and wish every cruiser have an owner like you, there are so many neglected ones out there that makes me sad.
Thats what my wife says (about keeping it). I will keep it as I don't see any valid reason why I shouldn't. I really like this car but I have no personal attachments to cars. When I did pretty much all the same work to 95 E34 BMW (CA car with 90k miles at that time) and my daughter totaled it - I was OK. Insurance is a biggest pain..

I will do an experiment. I will post it for sale soon. Market is good (for selling) and I have 2 cars. One have to go so.. Not sure which one. Probably M3 will go and LX stay. But if someone pays a price - LX will go. If I sell LX I will be getting brand new LX.
 
Hey, sweet tool:)

Snap rings - on both sides size D was a match. C wouldn't fit. Also, interesting it measured at 2.35-2.36 but those should be either 2.3 or 2.4 :)

View attachment 2754255
You're the only other person that I've seen mention anything about this! Thought I was the only one hah. I used my calipers at home and noticed the same size difference. Thought it was the cheap calipers so I brought them to work to use our precision calipers and micrometers and they are indeed off by about fifty-thousandths
 
Yesterday I finally put wheels on. Still don't have sway bar but other than that...

Started, silky smooth - engine mounts were needed
Power steering took some time but bled properly, no noise
No clunks going R/D
No play in wheels or steering

Truck got up on AHC, but still crooked. Need to bleed AHC and work with sensors, torsion bars and pressures.

Moved couple feet out and back into garage. No leaks anywhere so far. Fingers crossed :)

Hopefully will get it aligned and all ready by end of week
 
I will do an experiment. I will post it for sale soon. Market is good (for selling) and I have 2 cars. One have to go so.. Not sure which one. Probably M3 will go and LX stay. But if someone pays a price - LX will go. If I sell LX I will be getting brand new LX.

Just to see if it's even making sense - I stopped by dealer and test drove new LX. Mixed feelings. Feels much heavier and don't feel any faster. Bigger inside which I like but feels bigger and heavier more than I feel size increase inside if that makes sense.

Riding comfort - not sure I see any improvement. I think it is better soundproofed. But ride quality not so much.

So yes it's nice car but I am still on a fence if I should try and upgrade it. I will have to sell my 2 cars and add money on top to get it :)

P.S. Sit inside GX. Didn't want to even drive it. On outside I like it. Inside - blah. Small and cheap looking.
 
Just to see if it's even making sense - I stopped by dealer and test drove new LX. Mixed feelings. Feels much heavier and don't feel any faster. Bigger inside which I like but feels bigger and heavier more than I feel size increase inside if that makes sense.

Riding comfort - not sure I see any improvement. I think it is better soundproofed. But ride quality not so much.

So yes it's nice car but I am still on a fence if I should try and upgrade it. I will have to sell my 2 cars and add money on top to get it :)

P.S. Sit inside GX. Didn't want to even drive it. On outside I like it. Inside - blah. Small and cheap looking.
I agree with the gx, I’d rather pay less and have a 4runner but att the end it didn’t have the interior space I need so LX of the way for me
 
100 series is the sweet spot, I really tried to like the 200 series but just feels so big to daily it and parking and stuff. On paper they don’t seem bigger but drive one and you can get a sense of how much bigger they are when they try to park
 
Today I finally fixed very annoying play in steering. But NOT 100% fixed. I replaced bushings. There is 4 needed. But in reality, only 2 needed to be replaced, shown in circles. Picture shows bad one. It fixed all left-to-right play. However, I still have little up-down play (much less than it was) but I think now I need to replace that plastic bush/nut circled with X it looks damaged and I think it's adding to the issue. Overall almost fixed.

Also replaced clock spring. Made unpleasant noises, hopefully going to be fixed as well.

With AHC, if anyone knows - please comment. I did bleed per FSM twice. From what I can tell - front ones - fluid comes out steady and clear. Rears - steady but foamy. I did it twice.

Another thing - torsion bars. Left side is sagging. I understand AHC has nothing to do with it, right? Or not? Sensors just get averaged out, but pressure is equally distributed, correct? Currently I didn't look at computer, sensors set in a middle position, I am just trying to get height correct.

Anyways. According to adjusters they are both out of spec now, right side is over-loose and left side is over-tight. And yet I still have left side sitting 1 inch lower at N (more at H)

So.. Should I reindex or I should be fine with using adjusters as long as they don't bottom out (or start coming out of nut)?

IMG_4736.webp


IMG_4735.webp


IMG_4737.webp
 
Another thing - torsion bars. Left side is sagging. I understand AHC has nothing to do with it, right? Or not? Sensors just get averaged out, but pressure is equally distributed, correct? Currently I didn't look at computer, sensors set in a middle position, I am just trying to get height correct.

Anyways. According to adjusters they are both out of spec now, right side is over-loose and left side is over-tight. And yet I still have left side sitting 1 inch lower at N (more at H)

So.. Should I reindex or I should be fine with using adjusters as long as they don't bottom out (or start coming out of nut)?
My understanding is the front AHC sensors are averaged for height setting. Adjusting the Torsion bars is the way to get the front to level out. Shouldn't need to reindex unless you run out of adjustment.

One other note. The 100 series leans left because the left carriers more weight. Often a driver is riding without a passenger and more importantly the gas tank is on the left. Both these things, over time, cause the left springs to wear unevenly. Some others have had success not only tightening the front left torsion bar but also adding a 10mm spacer to the rear left spring.
 
My understanding is the front AHC sensors are averaged for height setting. Adjusting the Torsion bars is the way to get the front to level out. Shouldn't need to reindex unless you run out of adjustment.

One other note. The 100 series leans left because the left carriers more weight. Often a driver is riding without a passenger and more importantly the gas tank is on the left. Both these things, over time, cause the left springs to wear unevenly. Some others have had success not only tightening the front left torsion bar but also adding a 10mm spacer to the rear left spring.
Dang me not taking pics before disassembly. I did go through this exercise. When I bought truck it was leaning too but I got it evened out. Rear springs new (and different PNs from LC with AHC). Ok. Will keep cranking :)
 
Ok, well. Those torsion bar adjustments go long way. I indexed driver side maybe 3 tooth and now both adjustment bolts kind of out (not inside guard) and pressures around 2.1 (too low). Back tomorrow, will back out torsion bar maybe 1-2 clicks.
 
Today I finally fixed very annoying play in steering. But NOT 100% fixed. I replaced bushings. There is 4 needed. But in reality, only 2 needed to be replaced, shown in circles. Picture shows bad one. It fixed all left-to-right play. However, I still have little up-down play (much less than it was) but I think now I need to replace that plastic bush/nut circled with X it looks damaged and I think it's adding to the issue. Overall almost fixed.

Also replaced clock spring. Made unpleasant noises, hopefully going to be fixed as well.

With AHC, if anyone knows - please comment. I did bleed per FSM twice. From what I can tell - front ones - fluid comes out steady and clear. Rears - steady but foamy. I did it twice.

Another thing - torsion bars. Left side is sagging. I understand AHC has nothing to do with it, right? Or not? Sensors just get averaged out, but pressure is equally distributed, correct? Currently I didn't look at computer, sensors set in a middle position, I am just trying to get height correct.

Anyways. According to adjusters they are both out of spec now, right side is over-loose and left side is over-tight. And yet I still have left side sitting 1 inch lower at N (more at H)

So.. Should I reindex or I should be fine with using adjusters as long as they don't bottom out (or start coming out of nut)?

View attachment 2755790

View attachment 2755791

View attachment 2755792


katit: “I did bleed per FSM twice. From what I can tell - front ones - fluid comes out steady and clear. Rears - steady but foamy. I did it twice”:

IndroCruise: Froth and bubbles mean gas.

Either it is nitrogen from a ruptured membrane – possibly this should be suspected if ‘globes’ are old and in doubtful condition. It is less likely when ‘globes’ are known to be in good condition.

More likely, air is trapped somewhere in the system, particularly in the following circumstances:

  • air is trapped in the extremities such as in the ‘shock absorbers’. Even when the vehicle is resting on the bump stops the ‘shock absorbers’ still contain a volume of fluid – if air is in this fluid, it can take multiple raise/lower/bleed cycles to get this air to move. Note that in these cycles, fluid is being pushed into the ‘shock absorbers’ by the AHC Pump, then pushed back out again when the vehicle drops BUT not all of the fluid is moved – it is never a clean flush because of the remnant fluid left behind and which may contain air. Multiple cycles aim to dilute and eventual replace the air-infected fluid.
OR
  • air is trapped somewhere in the long lengths of pipes from the AHC Pump through the Control Valve Assembly and onwards to the bleeders. Imagine a ‘plug’ of air somewhere along the line. This must be pushed all the way through the system and out through the bleeders. The reason for multiple cycles is because the early cycles may only (in part) be compressing the air, and not fully displacing fluid.
OR
  • air is trapped in the Height Control Accumulator (HCA), meaning the long cylinder mid-way along the LHS chassis rail. The HCA is a special case. It is controlled by the solenoid valve at the front end. This solenoid valve is ‘normally closed’. There are only two points in the cycle when this valve opens: (i) when the AHC Pump is filling the HCA after completion of a raise, and, (ii) when the HCA is initiating a raise L >> N or N >> L when it is releasing fluid under pressure into the system, eventually to the ‘shock absorbers which causes the vehicle to raise. This is why the raise/lower cycles are important when bleeding. The only way to cause fluid in the HCA to move out through the bleeder is to open the bleeder after being quite sure that there has been enough time at the end of a previous raise to fill the HCA. Theoretically this might be about 15 seconds after the raise has stopped and indicator light has settled at “N” or “H” BUT allow say 60 seconds just to be sure, especially if there is air suspected in the system or pressures which are too high or suspicions about partial blockages, either of which may cause slow or incomplete filling operation by the AHC Pump. Obviously it is pointless to bleed the HCA unless sure that it has been filled.
OR
OR
  • Bleeding is undertaken from only one side of the vehicle. This is fine in theory because when the vehicle is stationary, the Front Gate Valve (in the Control Valve Assembly) is open and AHC Front Left is connected hydraulically to AHC Front Right. Pressures are equalised and fluid can flow between them. Ditto Rear AHC. But note that Front AHC and Rear AHC are not hydraulically connected. However, in practice if there is an air problem, where is the air actually located?? This is unknown. If there are bleeding difficulties, then bleed ALL five bleeders over multiple cycles.
OR
  • Air-infected fluid is re-used in the bleeding process, thereby re-introducing air and particulates into the system. Some folks are prepared to accept this risk. If certainty is required, use only fresh fluid.

Often AHC bleeding is a straightforward happy experience. Sometimes it takes multiple cycles (more than two cycles) and lots of patience and persistence!!

Hydraulic Circuit when vehicle is lowered - the difference from this diagram during bleeding is that the fluid exits at the bleeders, does not return to the AHC Tank:

AHC System - Lowering.jpg



katit: “Another thing - torsion bars. Left side is sagging. I understand AHC has nothing to do with it, right? Or not? Sensors just get averaged out, but pressure is equally distributed, correct? Currently I didn't look at computer, sensors set in a middle position, I am just trying to get height correct.

Anyways. According to adjusters they are both out of spec now, right side is over-loose and left side is over-tight. And yet I still have left side sitting 1 inch lower at N (more at H)

So.. Should I reindex or I should be fine with using adjusters as long as they don't bottom out (or start coming out of nut)?”


IndroCruise: Yes – exactly correct. ‘Cross-levelling’ is not done, cannot be done by the AHC system. The AHC system on LC100/LX470 is a two-channel system – Front and Rear. It is not a four-channel system. It cannot raise or lower or auto-adjust the heights of each of the four wheels independently of one another.

So after all other work is completed, setting up a vehicle with AHC always starts with ‘cross-levelling’ at the Front on level ground with no eccentric loads in or on the vehicle. This means using the Torsion Bar adjusters to equalise the hub-to-fender measurements at Front Right and Left Front with a tape-measure (FSM tolerance +/- 10 millimetres), nothing to do with Height Control Sensor adjusters. This may involve re-indexing if available thread on the adjuster bolts are insufficient. Note: Some leeway -- available thread -- is needed on the adjuster bolts because these will be used later when it comes time to use the adjuster bolts to adjust torsion bar loads and achieve correct Front AHC pressures.

On an AHC vehicle, the Torsion Bar adjusters have nothing to do with setting the ‘ride height’ or ‘operating height’ of the vehicle.

The purpose of Front cross-levelling is to have the Right and Left torsion bars carrying equal shares of the vehicle weight so that the vehilce performs Right and Left turns similarly (assuming steering geometry already has been correctly adjusted), and, to correct side-to-side lean which otherwise will complicate the later adjustments of ‘ride height’ also called ‘operating height’.

‘Ride height’ or ‘operating height’ is done later by moving the Height Control Sensor adjusters until they are all as close as possible to zero on Techstream when the vehicle is at the desired Front and Rear heights for the “N” height setting at the AHC controls on the centre console.

Theoretically in a vehicle with perfect geometry, if the Front is ‘cross-levelled’ correctly then Rear also is ‘cross-levelled’ correctly. The Rear cannot be different unless there is some cause of tilt or twist. In practice, a 14 to 22 year old vehicle will not be perfect due to manufacturing tolerances, wear and tear, some minor chassis twist, etc, etc and there may be some difference across the Rear heights.

It is important to be quite sure that all three Height Control Sensors are in good electrical condition and working correctly. Otherwise, there will be conflicting signals (voltages) sent by the Sensors to the Electronic Control Unit (ECU). Huge frustration then is guaranteed when trying to set ‘ride heights’ a.k.a. ‘operating heights’. Poor Sensors mean erratic signals and erratic suspension behaviour. If the voltage signals from the three Sensors are widely different and the ECU cannot resolve the conflict, then the ECU is unable to determine the auto-adjustment position at “N” (or any other height selected by the driver). Then the ECU will choose the version of ‘fail safe’ mode associated with Sensor problems. This mode prevents proper AHC operation and prevents adaptive damping, meaning that ride quality will be poor. Depending on the actual signal from any Sensor, there may or may not be a DTC associated with this 'fail safe' mode. Absence of a DTC does not provide assurance that all is well with the Height Control Sensor(s).
 
Last edited:
Often AHC bleeding is a straightforward happy experience. Sometimes it takes multiple cycles (more than two cycles) and lots of patience and persistence!!

....


The purpose of Front cross-levelling is to have the Right and Left torsion bars carrying equal shares of the vehicle weight so that the vehilce performs Right and Left turns similarly (assuming steering geometry already has been correctly adjusted), and, to correct side-to-side lean which otherwise will complicate the later adjustments of ‘ride height’ also called ‘operating height’.


For AHC bleeding. I will order 2 more cans of fluid and keep on going. Just to make sure again - I am putting car in N, wait for pump to stop, shut down car and bleed a little from each. If I do a lot from one rear - whole rear drops and then nothing comes from other side. I feel like maybe it's better to bleed one side only. And maybe from H position to get fluid out of shocks fast?

See, I did rear and front shocks disconnect, so there was air everywhere. Also I drove with rear end redone for a while and now I see foamy fluid from rear. Also, I did replace spheres recently (10-15k ago) and I have about 12 graduations from H to L


Torsion bars and leveling. Thats a catch 22, isn't it? Geometry is NOT correct. I replaced steering rack, I set upper control arms adjustors in a middle. I approx set tie rod ends. I did center steering wheel and rack though to get even L to R lock to lock rotations. But car is definitely not aligned. I am trying to get height and pressures into norm so I can tighten control arm bolts in N position and take it for alignment.

But from what I am reading - they also might need to do some height adjustments during alignment? Is that normal part of job? I am really worrying about shop being capable to do it right
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom