I Like Big Brakes and I Cannot Lie!!!

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Dirty Koala

SILVER Star
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Threads
56
Messages
3,550
Location
Draper, UT
With the lackluster 80 series brakes and all the excess weight, extra power on tap with forced induction and a few close calls...I have wanted to get some better braking performance. I have already moved to 17” wheels, so rotor diameter is not limited like with the stock 16” wheels.

My goal was to keep the parts used as OEM as possible for future availability and maintenance ease/cost.

I new that the 5th gen 4Runner front calipers share the same bolt pattern as the 80 series calipers so I ordered up a pair from Toyota. I also wanted to attempt to make the front brakes easier to service by going to a slip fit design, allowing the hub to be left in place...the early 200 series rotor dimensions looked promising...so picked up a pair of those too.

The early 200 rotors are 13.3” diameter...same as the 5th gen 4Runner diameter.

The theory was to machine the hub wheel face down enough to allow the centerline of the 200 rotor to sit in the middle of the 4Runner caliper. My friend @I Lean then took my hubs to his lathe to turn them down enough to get the center line matched up.

After getting the rotor mounting depth on the hub right, the next step is to ensure the slip fit rotors are hub centric. Since the 80 hub is 106mm and the 200 rotor hub hole is 112mm, the solution what to cut out a .25” plate ring that could be pressed over the hub and then turned down on the lathe to 112mm.

This pic shows the machined face with ring pressed on and turned down. The rotor fits perfectly centered in place.
B50F4588-EB22-475E-BA02-3A094B95EFD8.jpeg


This next part isn’t essential, but it is one solution to a problem that kept in line with my design to stick with OEM parts. When moving to a slip fit design, the thickness of the hub mating face of the rotor (.25”) would reduce engagable wheel stud length by the same amount. You could solve this problem a few ways.
  • Get longer M12 studs from some other application.
  • Use ET lug nuts designed to engage further down the threads.
  • The option I went with...use 100 series M14 wheel studs. These are longer and also stronger. I liked this since I have already snapped M12 wheel studs on the interstate and that is some scary sh!t.
So the wheel studs holes got drilled out to accept the M14 studs and new studs pressed into the hubs. I also swapped out the hub studs with ARP studs.
85AB28BD-E616-4107-985D-E9BF5A83CCFE.jpeg


The last step is to modify the bolt pattern on the 200 rotor from 5 bolt to 6 bolt. @I Lean cut out a template on his plasma table to use as a drill pattern. This is the only part that would be great to find a better solution for...such as rotor blanks pre-drilling.

Test fitment of hub and rotor in 17” Icon Alloy wheel once my new M14x1.5 Method lugs arrived.
34D956CC-1AE3-425E-88DF-6EF2A808737E.jpeg


After rebuilding the knuckle (while your in there victim), I slapped the rotor, caliper and pads on...pretty happy with the result so far.
C5188539-FCB6-4C00-B63E-5C52C910710A.jpeg


The pad alignment is perfect with the 13.3” rotors
614A2344-D610-493E-9C2E-945E334E0A02.jpeg


I still need to hook up the hydraulics and figure out if I need to change out the master with a larger bore...but will run as-is to test before touching the master.
 
Last edited:
Nice. I have 16”’wheels and bolted 100series calipers on, and found a slight off center condition I don’t think the calipers will care but they do need clearanced a bit for the rotor with casting features. Have a set ground and waiting on new pads to see how they work.

27A70D23-A0EC-442F-A244-769702DE63EB.jpeg
 
Nice. I have 16”’wheels and bolted 100series calipers on, and found a slight off center condition I don’t think the calipers will care but they do need clearanced a bit for the rotor with casting features. Have a set ground and waiting on new pads to see how they work.

View attachment 2276707
Which rotors are you using?
 
Slight correction for you--the 200 rotors have a 112mm center hole, it's the wheels that have the 110mm. :)
Good catch Carl...fixed it.
 
Which rotors are you using?
Stock 80. Is out set about 1/8” from where it needs to be. Correct way would be spacing the rotor inward with spacer but that would require tear down. I’ll do that next time I have the front down. Want to test the 100 series calipers first. So slight grind clearance will test that.
 
Last edited:
"The theory was to machine the hub wheel face down enough to allow the centerline of the 200 rotor to sit in the middle of the 4Runner caliper. My friend @I Lean then took my hubs to his lathe to turn them down enough to get the center line matched up."

How far down did you have to machine the hub face to center the rotor in the caliper?
 
"The theory was to machine the hub wheel face down enough to allow the centerline of the 200 rotor to sit in the middle of the 4Runner caliper. My friend @I Lean then took my hubs to his lathe to turn them down enough to get the center line matched up."

How far down did you have to machine the hub face to center the rotor in the caliper?
About .160” or 4mm. Could go another .040” to perfectly center.
 
How thick would the hub flange be after machining .200" off the face? I wish I had a hub laying around to explore this possibility!
I would just use the same ARP studs I put in the rear axle and not cut them down, they would be the perfect length.
You have come up with a great idea!!

Amazon product ASIN B001O09TBQ
 
Do you think it would be possible to make it hub-centric by just machining that tolerance into the hub flange vs having to press on a ring?

With only .160" removed, that would not be enough to work. I'm hoping/thinking the .200" will be enough, and that is my plan on the next set I do.

How thick would the hub flange be after machining .200" off the face? I wish I had a hub laying around to explore this possibility!
I would just use the same ARP studs I put in the rear axle and not cut them down, they would be the perfect length.
You have come up with a great idea!!

It will be .71" thick, measured from the original rotor mounting face to the wheel face.

I don't think there will be a need for longer studs, since you'd only be losing .050" of stud length compared with stock. The 14mm stud upgrade is neat by itself though. :cool:
 
Stock 80. Is out set about 1/8” from where it needs to be. Correct way would be spacing the rotor inward with spacer but that would require tear down. I’ll do that next time I have the front down. Want to test the 100 series calipers first. So slight grind clearance will test that.
Make sure to post up your findings, I am interested to see the results.
 
@I Lean , time to make the rotors :D
 
Sounds like a great plan!
What year/part number did you use for the rotors?
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a great plan!
What year/part number did you use for the rotors?
There are are wide range of years to select from...all using the same parts. But to keep it simple I went with 2010 4Runner calipers and 2010 Landcruiser rotors.
 
The hydraulic fitting on the 4Runner caliper shares the same thread pitch and size as the 80 caliper M10x1.0. The 4Runner typically uses an inverted flare fitting, with a hard line coming right off the caliper. This does make servicing a 4Runner a pain and some guys have converted to banjo bolt soft lines...just like the 80 has.

The OEM 80 banjo bolt is just a hair too long for the ;runner caliper. With an extra copper washer it fits fine. I opted to shave 2 threads off the bolt instead...took all of 5 mins to cut and clean up.
8CCBBEE3-0527-4046-A75C-DCC67E58F8A0.jpeg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom