Full disclosure: I don't have a 250 (yet?). I have a 2006 100 and a 2020 4Runner.
I was washing the 4Runner yesterday (because it's 75 degrees in the middle of November) and played my newest least favorite game: Is it another paint chip or spec of dirt. 4 out 5 times, it's a chip. No exaggeration, my '06 Land Cruiser with 190,000 miles has fewer paint chips than my 44,000 mile '20 4Runner. This is discussed on 4Runner boards, e.g., "Which color chips the least?" etc.
It may be too early - most 250s probably have under 3,000 miles, and many/most have PPF - but I'm wondering, is my 4Runner indicative how Toyota is painting all of its vehicles? Is the Land Cruiser different?
Side note... As I was washing the 4Runner, I was thinking about "quality" and "reliability" and how they're similar but don't each necessarily apply evenly. It's hard to knock the reliability of a 5th gen 4Runner, but it doesn't "feel" like an unusually high-quality truck. It reminded me of a classic Bic pen, i.e., it's lightweight, feels cheap, but will work forever.
I was washing the 4Runner yesterday (because it's 75 degrees in the middle of November) and played my newest least favorite game: Is it another paint chip or spec of dirt. 4 out 5 times, it's a chip. No exaggeration, my '06 Land Cruiser with 190,000 miles has fewer paint chips than my 44,000 mile '20 4Runner. This is discussed on 4Runner boards, e.g., "Which color chips the least?" etc.
It may be too early - most 250s probably have under 3,000 miles, and many/most have PPF - but I'm wondering, is my 4Runner indicative how Toyota is painting all of its vehicles? Is the Land Cruiser different?
Side note... As I was washing the 4Runner, I was thinking about "quality" and "reliability" and how they're similar but don't each necessarily apply evenly. It's hard to knock the reliability of a 5th gen 4Runner, but it doesn't "feel" like an unusually high-quality truck. It reminded me of a classic Bic pen, i.e., it's lightweight, feels cheap, but will work forever.