- Thread starter
- #41
I have a bunch at work too. Can you get me the exact length that you used to cut down on my R&D time?![]()
9-1/2" is perfect.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I have a bunch at work too. Can you get me the exact length that you used to cut down on my R&D time?![]()
To try it out, I just blanked them off. No issues. I'm going to either put some nipples on the SS tube or just install some on the top half of the airbox - eventually. There aren't any vacuum leaks since they are all connected to end-user points (Charcoal Canister, Crankcase Vent, etc). I'm going to check mileage first to see if I want to keep this setup. I may end up w/ the Resonator back in, but obviously keeping the K&N and deckplate.
any update on the mileage?
Thanks,
Kirk
Did you ever end up re-hooking the lines back up? One of them looks to be for the fuel pressure regulator, not something you want to leave blocked off. And if you aren't hooking them back up, it'd likely be better if you left the crankcase vent and charcoal canister open to atm.
And finally, those rubber plumbing couplings don't typically last very long in an engine bay. I had a couple friends try them out years back on home made intakes and they would get greasy and tear apart over time (likely due to all of the temperature cycling).
Rich
Not yet. One was for crankcase vent, one for charcoal canister, and one went to the power steering pump - I'm assuming for variable speed steering or something? Hasn't hurt so far.
just to add my 2 cents.
-i put in the k&n about a year ago. didnt know anything about the maf getting fouled. just ran it for a year mainly city driving, so never really paid attention to mpgs. just filled it once a week. ended up on a job site about 30 highway miles out of town. took 1/3 of a tank there and back???? wtf? like 8mpg...hwy??? i do have 325/75's @ 50psi and the ome lift but wtf? after a bit of searching i figured out it may be the fouling. pull the maf and woah. it looked like two rat turds. huge ones. no cel. (the t.b. was also filthy, lots of visible dirt and oil) so i cleaned it w/ the spray and swapped in new plugs. now i get around ~280 miles to a tank on the hwy. so 13mpgs. waay better. screw the k&N. now i just feel bad for telling everyone i know how great they are.
There are 4 lines on my '98 that tied to the stock intake. Crankcase vent, charcoal canister, power steering, and fuel pressure regulator. The smallest of the 4 went to the FPR mounted on the passenger side fuel rail. Perhaps there is a difference between the 98's and the later years?
I built an intake for my truck as well, and then later on did the airbox mod. Both definitely seemed to make improvements independantly. Wife has been driving it mainly now, and she doesn't keep track of mileage as much as I used to, but she hasn't reported any stark mileage differences to me. I just posted about it in a different thread, but I'll try and snap some pics of the setup I did.
Rich
How do we reconcile the above perceptions with the hard data from the dyno? Not trying to knock the effort (or the perception) but I thought we had some pretty solid evidence that if anything the deck plate was creating turbulence that was messing with the fuel trim pretty badly, all while producing zero improvement in output....
https://forum.ih8mud.com/100-series-cruisers/458991-gutless-01-a-2.html#post6378928
Rob, how many runs did you make with the deck plate removed? If only one pass was made, I'm wondering if the ECU was trying to learn and make changes to compensate for the additional air. Perhaps it needed more time to learn?