Warranty and installation instructions here:
http://installersupport.info/InstallInstructDFCRev.pdf
Web site with install:
View video
Interesting 30-minute video where you can hear Dennis Merle Lee explain a lot about this product.
http://dutman.vo.llnwd.net/o15/hafcwin/winhafchi.wmv
-B-
I watched portions of the videos and was very disappointed in some of the misstatements he made.
He explains how he makes "water gas"... it's simply electrolysis, using electricity to separate water into it's constituent elements, hydrogen and oxygen.
Explanation of electrolysis:
Electrolysis of water - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Unfortunately, the process of generating hydrogen and oxygen through electrolysis and then burning it for energy LOOSES energy. Ie: you get less energy out of burning gases generated through electrolosys than you would just using the energy directly. As that electricity comes from burning fuel in your engine, you're just wasting energy to produce the "water gas".
For efficiency of electrolysis:
Electrolysis of water - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He appears to offer an additive to put in the "fuel cell", ostensibly to improve it's efficiency. This substance is probably a salt, as ionizing water improves the rate of electrolysis.
His claims of that the flame is cool are a highly suspect. He melts a sheet of copper using a "water gas" flame. Copper's melting point is almost 2000 degrees:
Copper - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thus, the flame must be at least 2000 degrees. Fortunately for him, the sheet is very thin, and melts quickly. However, as you can see, he drops the sheet with some enthusiasm as the flame gets nearer and nearer to his hand.
"As you can see the gas is not transferring heat into my hands." (11:00).
Well, the flame is transferring heat to the metal, and the metal is transferring heat into his hand. Seems pretty straightforward to me, making his statement misleading at best.
He does the same trick with a piece of tungsten, saying of the flame, claiming "it does not transfer the heat to my fingers." Well, if that were true, he could keep holding the tungsten in his fingers indefinitely.
Now, why is he showing off that he can melt metals with his flame? That does nothing to demonstrate that his "water gas" improves the combustion efficiency of an engine. This seems to be a distraction, "smoke and mirrors".
"Water gas changes it's temperature to the melting temperature of the material that it touches". If that were true, it would melt your intake manifold into a pile of slag.
The salesman describing what happens when the gas travels into your manifold... water gas "will change it's melting temperature to the characteristics of the fuel". He seems to be mixing states of matter up here. You're mixing a gas (his "water fuel" being hydrogen and oxygen), with outside air (mostly nitrogen, some oxygen, many many other gases in small amounts), and vaporized gas. Ie: all vapor and gas. It cannot melt, it's not a solid. It can't boil, it's not a liquid. Another incorrect statement.
Now, let's look at how hydrogen and oxygen perform in an internal combustion engine. At hydrogen's stoichiometric ratio (34:1 by mass), injecting gaseous hydrogen into a combustion chamber produces only 85% the energy that gasoline does at it's stoichiometric ratio. In other words, burning only hydrogen and oxygen using his method produces less power than using gasoline. I don't see how mixing it with atomized gasoline would change it's combustion characteristics
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/tech_validation/pdfs/fcm03r0.pdf
Magnets ionize the fuel:
Magnets do not ionize fuel. Ionization occurs as you add electrons to a molecule through either electrical current or chemical changes.
Room temperature fuel additive "breaks down covalent bonds" in the gasoline.
Covalent bonds are between the valence electron shells of atoms. These bonds form the basis of a hydrocarbon. Making or breaking these chemical bonds either uses energy (endothermic) or creates energy (exothermic). So, pouring this substance, if it does make/break bonds, would either cool down the temperature of the liquid in the tank, or heat it up (fire?). Putting a chemical reaction into a gastank is foolish beyond belief. Also, it changes the chemical makeup of the substance. If it's another chemical, is it still gasoline?
Covalent bond - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
He claims that one of the ingredients of his additives is xylene. This I can believe, as xylene is a common octane booster. However, it's usually present in gasoline already. Higher grades of gasoline have greater amounts, boosting their octane, allowing the engine to run leaner.
Xylene as a fuel additive:
Gasoline Digest Page 2
Basic gasoline properties/ingredients:
Gasoline - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd go on, but I'm too tired, and need to go to bed.