Um... That's pretty much what I said...![]()
Which is pretty much what I said with the wheelbarrow example.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Um... That's pretty much what I said...![]()
Um... That's pretty much what I said...![]()
Which is pretty much what I said with the wheelbarrow example.![]()
The 80 already has a 30"+ long radius arm that has very little angle on a typical 4" lift, plus it offers virtually no droop as you prepare to climb an obstacle. This is why it is so easy to put the 80's front end up on just about anything as long as you can clear your approach angle.
Flipping the arms to help the 80 climb better re: the "wheelbarrow" example will have no practical advantage - in fact, adding flex to the system will create more droop on one side, which will cause the angle/leverage argument to come into play in certain situations. This is exactly what happens on Jeeps with very flexy long arm conversions - the tire still wants to push down and back when it drops into a hole and has to climb even with a 36" radius arm (a flat arm with a ton of droop will ultimately have more issues than a slightly angled arm that doesn't flex).
The price that is paid for this front end rigidity is of course rigidity as it's not terribly comfortable offroad, and it can force a lot of lean in some cases, but it will climb rather than pushing down pretty effortlessly. On an 80, this is not a problem that needs to be solved unless you are bringing significantly increased flex into the equation.
This is a good example showing what happens when you add flex to the front end - you get a tire in a hole, and it wants to push down and back even with a long radius arm suspension.
Now compare to the non-flexy 80. The tire doesn't drop into the hole (the whole rig leans into the hole, but the radius arm is keeping relatively little angle), so the front end climb is effortless, but because of the rigid front end it forces a lot of lean to take that line and the rear suspension has to take all of the flex. The 80 will feel much more tippy here, but leverage on the arm/wheel is not an issue whereas more flexy rigs really have to climb out of that hole against the natural tendency of the suspension.
"Flex" is never an independent variable, and it is not always in your favor on a large rig. Even if it makes for great poser pics on forklifts and curbs.
Check out this online physics game. You can actually create little rigs that illustrate what is being discussed here. It's obviously rudimentary, but it can help you understand some of the concepts being discussed here if you are having a hard time visualizing it.
Fantastic Contraption: A fun online physics puzzle game
After reading this entire thread I have reached a decision:
I am going to wax my truck.
![]()
Don't forget to polish your snorkel![]()
Dusty, your 80 has some serious articulation. Did you do a "Y" setup in the front? It looks like it is just a single control arm with one link on the axle end.
View attachment 337986
View attachment 337987
View attachment 337988
Hey, this is a family friendly site.![]()
That's right, it is... Now get your mind out of the gutter!![]()
Besides my snorkel has a textured finish........................![]()
F***ing sensors at work won't let me play![]()
front is a 3 link.
rear is a radius arm with a joint at the "y"
pics of rear are in my build up