First dust for the LX... (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

I'm not gonna scan the titles, but this is fact:

FJ40 owner: Michael

LX450 owner: Claudia

FZJ80 owner: Michael - granted, it lives in another state

:meh:
 
Claudia

I know the truck died when you test drove it. What type of surgery did Dr. Kevin have to do to get it running again? After four pages of this thread inquiring minds want to know.
 
Only one person holds a CSC number. Nothing has changed:meh:, this is the way it has been since day one. I know this first hand because I was there.:flipoff2:Some family members have opted to have there own personal CSC number. Pattersons, Pitts, and the Keefes come to mind. With that said as always from day one everyone and anyone is welcome to attend, participate, and enjoy any CSC event even your family.:rolleyes:


Now back to the first dust on the OP LX450
 
Claudia

I know the truck died when you test drove it. What type of surgery did Dr. Kevin have to do to get it running again? After four pages of this thread inquiring minds want to know.

Can't be told on the interwebs, sorry :eek: - inkpot found it :clap:

15 minutes - VROOM :bounce:
 
Last edited:
Only one person holds a CSC number. Nothing has changed:meh:, this is the way it has been since day one. I know this first hand because I was there.:flipoff2:Some family members have opted to have there own personal CSC number. Pattersons, Pitts, and the Keefes come to mind. With that said as always from day one everyone and anyone is welcome to attend, participate, and enjoy any CSC event even your family.:rolleyes:


Now back to the first dust on the OP LX450

Maybe I'm just old, failing memory, but don't remember ever discussing, anything but family friendly membership, in line with the other TLC organizations? Please link to the individual membership rule. Yes, you were there, provided some humorous interjection related to if cohabitation qualified, was proof of copulation was required, etc.

I don't have a problem with changing it, or claiming it was otherwise, doesn't effect me. Lots of confusion lately, time for a good set of bylaws.
 
Maybe I'm just old, failing memory, but don't remember ever discussing, anything but family friendly membership, in line with the other TLC organizations? Please link to the individual membership rule. Yes, you were there, provided some humorous interjection related to if cohabitation qualified, was proof of copulation was required, etc.

I don't have a problem with changing it, or claiming it was otherwise, doesn't effect me. Lots of confusion lately, time for a good set of bylaws.

Im not going to debate the "I'm just old, failing memory" part:flipoff2: but Im confused on what are you arguing?

Please reread my post with an open mind because your reply is implying things that I did not say.
 
"....Inkpot for the win!"

:lol::D

Its nice when the repairs are simple ~
 
the truck ran excellent on the test drive - dying on the way to the bank 30 minutes later was just such a freak occurrence, it had to be something simple

temporarily, the aftermarket dizzy cap and rotor were pilfered from Rosie the parts truck - but since then, new OEM dizzy cap and rotor have been installed - black fan clutch and 3FE fan are still in a box
 
"....Inkpot for the win!"

:lol::D

Its nice when the repairs are simple ~


Well,:hmm: ya know,:idea: it just takes the right Simpleton :doh:to make a simple diagnosis:eek:, or decision. :rimshot

Actually, I just got lucky on that one!!:banana:
 
:meh: Doesn't matter to me, my wife likely doesn't care if she can wear her CSC shirt anymore. It was heavily discussed back in the beginning and IIRC this is the adopted policy. It's the same as/mirrors most other clubs (like AzLCA, TLCA, etc). If the policy has changed, those with families may want to explore other options that are more family friendly/accommodating? ?

To the best of my comprehension capability, the subject was mentioned twice in that thread so I don't believe it is heavily discussed. Furthermore, there is no confirmation of adoption.

Who, phantoms don't count.



I'm disappointed, thought that you were the search ninja, had the whole net indexed? This only took a couple of min: https://forum.ih8mud.com/showpost.php?p=875287&postcount=6 , https://forum.ih8mud.com/showpost.php?p=875832&postcount=15 Long before my time.

Rumor has it my internet skill has been a joke topic at the shop, I guess I believe it now.

It didn't happen long before your time, Year 2006 is after 2005, https://forum.ih8mud.com/showpost.php?p=784702&postcount=22

:meh: His choice, but doesn't change anything, at least under the old policy, he was still a member. Likely a good time to write down a set of rules, so members know what to expect, what the policies are?

This doesn't sound like you. I suggest you either start a new thread or bring it up at the next meeting if you are looking for rules and policies.
 
Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it's failures.

History .....

People are quick to turn any new discussion topic into rules and bylaws discussion. People who keep talking about rules and bylaws are people who oppose them. None of those threads ended well.


I am done with this thread. I made my points and I am out.
 
Claudia

I know the truck died when you test drove it. ...

The note that "it wasn't running" is sort of an insider joke, based on two happenstances in the past:

1. The '40 wanted to die halfway thru the test drive as well back then :); electrical issue, suddenly (right in the middle of a big intersection...) not enough juice to the coil/bad ground; enough to support idle, but no more...

2. I can't count the times I thought I had found the perfect parts donor truck for the Blazer, mostly axles and/or transfer case, only to have my lovely wife make the points that a) I really didn't need it, and b) there's no sense in buying a vehicle that's not running... ;)
It was a sensible point, given that I neither had the infrastructure to transport, nor the space to store such a precious part donor...

Fast forward to the here and now... she finds a vehicle we don't "need", and to top it off, it's not running, and guess what happens... :princess: :flamingo:
 
Geez, thought I was done, but your bait is too good.:eek:

To the best of my comprehension capability, the subject was mentioned twice in that thread so I don't believe it is heavily discussed. Furthermore, there is no confirmation of adoption.

It was discussed, some on the forum, some in person, sorry that it wasn't to your satisfaction. That is the way the club worked and worked well when it was a smaller/tighter group. Things were discussed, if there was no significant opposition, were adopted. To my knowledge, there has never been an official vote/adoption procedure implemented/used for any of the issues, maybe it's time?

Rumor has it my internet skill has been a joke topic at the shop, I guess I believe it now.

It has nothing to do with the "shop". The first time I heard it was IIRC at a meet, from Phil, a very longtime ago. I wouldn't classify it as a joke, more of a complement of your net skills. If the complement offends you, say the word and I will never mention it again.

It didn't happen long before your time, Year 2006 is after 2005, https://forum.ih8mud.com/showpost.php?p=784702&postcount=22

BMAN was prez at that time, so not, as you say, "my administration".

This doesn't sound like you. I suggest you either start a new thread or bring it up at the next meeting if you are looking for rules and policies.

I'm all about simple and that can work well, as long as the group is relatively small. As the group grows, it's normal for "clicks"/smaller groups to form, among those who have the same sub interests within the main interest of the group. At any one meet, it's no longer possible for an individual to have meaningful conversation with everyone, so the small group/family type atmosphere is lost. Communication breaks down, misunderstandings increase, etc.

Sound familiar? I'm not your "fix it man", happy to be out of it. But, would think that a good set of policies/rules, so everyone knows what is expected, would be a good start? Would be a start at reducing the misunderstandings (like this one) that have been cropping up more and more often lately.

I do know that picking on, slandering, etc, those who we don't like, would prefer would go away, doesn't work. Especially if they have been around for a while, tend to dig in and give it a :meh:, while by the same action, we alienate other potentially valuable people.

Whatever, out.
 
History .....

People are quick to turn any new discussion topic into rules and bylaws discussion. People who keep talking about rules and bylaws are people who oppose them. None of those threads ended well.


I am done with this thread. I made my points and I am out.
Too bad your done with this thread, because you have it totally backwards. I think this club had some to a point where it does need some rules/bylaws.. CSC has arrived, even passed, at that point where it is large enough and diverse enough that verbal management and control are loosing effectiveness. This is a very common occurrence in many clubs/organizations. The vast majority of the current membership has no idea of who the original founding members are, who is on the BOD ( not always the some people ), Who the officers are, or if we have a "missions Statement". Several members have assumed that I was an officer, probably because I am here a lot, I talk a lot, I wheel a lot, I'm an old fart, whatever. I have been a member/officers in a multitude of clubs/organizations from PTAs, to investment clubs, to Unions. I have been involved in writing and amending rules, guidelines, bylaws, standards, whatever, for a long time. I think CSC is way overdue. It would be a natural extension of the new, more formal, monthly club meetings.
 
Too bad your done with this thread, because you have it totally backwards. I think this club had some to a point where it does need some rules/bylaws.. CSC has arrived, even passed, at that point where it is large enough and diverse enough that verbal management and control are loosing effectiveness. This is a very common occurrence in many clubs/organizations. The vast majority of the current membership has no idea of who the original founding members are, who is on the BOD ( not always the some people ), Who the officers are, or if we have a "missions Statement". Several members have assumed that I was an officer, probably because I am here a lot, I talk a lot, I wheel a lot, I'm an old fart, whatever. I have been a member/officers in a multitude of clubs/organizations from PTAs, to investment clubs, to Unions. I have been involved in writing and amending rules, guidelines, bylaws, standards, whatever, for a long time. I think CSC is way overdue. It would be a natural extension of the new, more formal, monthly club meetings.

I for one welcome new ideas. Start a new thread outline your ideas and submit a pole. End this thread hijack!

Nothing will get accomplished without direction except more bickering and weak personal attacks.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom