Search 9011 bulb for both low and high beams. All it takes is a minor trim of the plastic tab in the bulb to make them fit and the light output is actually pretty good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Dunno how I missed that solution, seems perfect. I'll make this my weekend project. The only thing I was kind of concerned about is this crack, but it doesn't seem to go all the way through and it's fairly high up.Search 9011 bulb for both low and high beams. All it takes is a minor trim of the plastic tab in the bulb to make them fit and the light output is actually pretty good.
I don't hate that idea, but don't you need an aftermarket bumper to mount those kinds of fog lights? Have not been able to find a post of people doing this without one. Also, I do feel not wonderful about putting 9011 in the low beam spot - worth it to just do what you're kind of meant to do and put 9012s in low beams?I installed Rigid Industries fog lights to use in addition to replacement low beam bulbs. The model I got is "D-Series PRO SAE Fog Yellow Pair SKU: 504816"
I bought the brightest Sylvania replacement low beam bulbs for my factory housings (without going to the 9011 high beam bulb in the low-beam position as mentioned above) and that made the low beams almost OK.
The Rigid fog lamps are SAE / DOT compliant so you can turn them on any time on the highway without blinding oncoming traffic and without getting a ticket for using offroad lights on the road.
The fog lamps are equally as bright as the brand new low beam bulbs in the factory housings, so essentially double the light when I have the fog lamps and low beams on together (which is whenever it's dark enough to need headlights).
The fog lamps are hands down my favorite upgrade on the cruiser. I was daily driving it for two years and now my wife daily drives it and we both use the fog lamps every time we use the headlights. The amber color is great for not messing up your night vision and it doesn't glare off of dust/rain/snow/fog in the air. I can't recommend them enough for vehicles with old technology headlights. They are expensive but I value the even beam pattern with a sharp cutoff to avoid blinding other drivers and the SAE / DOT legality so I don't have to worry about johnny law harassing me for using extra lights. Plus they have a nice wide beam that lights up the road shoulders or shines around corners a little on mountain twisty roads.
For the tires it just depends on if you want to try something new or go with a proven option.Springs came, waiting for my shocks gonna start putting penetrating oil on every night. Hopefully by the end of the month I'll have the new suspension on.
Considering tires, I'm leaning towards AT3 (still in between 265 and 285) but curious if anyone's used the new KO3s? I really can't find much on them, but they're definitely available now. Not a single post I can find on 80-Series, only some 200-Series posts when they were waiting for a year.
Makes sense, I'll just stick to AT3s.For the tires it just depends on if you want to try something new or go with a proven option.
For things as variable as tires I like to let other people try the new stuff first.
I know I'm basically there too, speedo is way more accurate, probably quieter, maybe a bit better MPG. Definitely cheaper by a few hundred. The 285s are just tempting me with looks haha but I will probably do 265s because it's the very reasonable thing to do. I doubt 285s will give me any benefit for how I use the rig other than vanity points.I'm firmly in the 265 75 R16 camp for snow tires on the stock 16x7 wheels. The narrower the better for snowy road driving. They might be a little cheaper too which never hurts. I'd buy 5 and rotate the spare on once in a while.
This is solid to hear in some ways but makes this a bit harder, I wish you had told me 265s were way better than 285s haha. I'll probably go with 265s at the end of the day though.I don’t know, there really isn’t a nickel’s worth of difference between 265’s and 285’ once you drive around the block and then take a look at them. My rig came with fairly new 265’s, ran them for 6 months and then took off for some Wildpeak at3’s and ran them for 3 1/2 years. Took them off in April to put on another truck and went back to the 265 with a plan to go tall skinny 255/85r16. The 265’s give a little better mpg, I can hold 3rd gear longer on my local grades that I absolutely push until a brief shift into 2nd. I’ll pull 2nd at 4800 rpm touching 70 mph as I crest the grade, have done that a bunch of times, 1FZ FE doesn’t care. I’m actually liking the 265’s just fine. Basically stock rig with WKOR sliders, Dissent front bumper, OME 861/862 Springs with 10mm spacers and Dobinson’s IMS shocks. Just got 14.8 mpg with medium load round trip mountain run.
Yeah fair enough, and the cost can be pretty marginal. E rated are probably overkill if I'm not rock crawling as well, right? SL vs E are pretty hefty price difference, not quite sure I really need E rated.To be more clear, I was mainly indicating that there really isn’t a nickel’s worth of difference regarding their looks. Drive around the block and you forget what the other one looked like. There is a bit of performance difference however, but also somewhat marginal.
It just depends on what you are using the cruiser for. E might be overkill if you are rarely off road, but having the tougher tires makes sense if you spend time on gravel and rocky roads. It looks like the E version weights 7lbs more per tire.Yeah fair enough, and the cost can be pretty marginal. E rated are probably overkill if I'm not rock crawling as well, right? SL vs E are pretty hefty price difference, not quite sure I really need E rated.
I am really glad the hardest thing I have to deal with now is what tires I want haha, this has come a long way.It just depends on what you are using the cruiser for. E might be overkill if you are rarely off road, but having the tougher tires makes sense if you spend time on gravel and rocky roads. It looks like the E version weights 7lbs more per tire.
Since you are in WY and have access to so many remote dirt and gravel roads I'd recommend going with the E version. Don't be scared of the bigger size as well (285/75/16) if you truly plan on some off road driving. Having just a little more clearance isn't a bad thing and they will still be great in the snow.
That's what I chose for mine after buying the rig with practically bald tires 3 years ago. The stock wheels are 16x8. The BFG I got are load range E. I figured this was probably best for the Denali highway and possibly the Dempster or Dalton in the future. Also this size is almost stock so speedometer/odometer will be fairly accurate. OEM suspension here. It's a nice ride, I see no reason to replace it for my needs.I'm firmly in the 265 75 R16 camp for snow tires on the stock 16x7 wheels. The narrower the better for snowy road driving. They might be a little cheaper too which never hurts. I'd buy 5 and rotate the spare on once in a while.